Good news!  I wear them and there's not much to get used to.  My glasses have 3 zones.  Close, mid-range and distance.  When I look through the lenses straight on I get distance.  If I lower my eyes a bit I can see my speedometer or screen on my laptop perfectly.  If I look lower I find I can read just about anything.

Maybe it took all of 3 days fr them to work for me seamlessly.

If I intend to read a book for a few hours, I generally take my glasses off entirely.

Whenever I'm not wearing my contacts I wear my progressive lense eyeglasses.  Progressive contacts?  Have had them but found they were more troublesome than helpful.

I just have lined bifocals but I have heard of them Patty.  I don't mind the lines at all.  I don't wear contacts anymore either - I quit wearing them about 10 years ago.  I'm near-sighted and do alot of things up close, in which I have to take my glasses off, like when I'm beading, reading close-up, hand sewing, etc.  My bifocals don't help at all with doing those things, but I couldn't drive or watch TV without them.

At my last exam, the doc said my near-sightedness was improving, he says it does that sometimes with age.  If you try them, let us know -

I got seamless glasses a few years ago and couldn't tolerate them. For some reason, the part of the glasses that corrected my typical nearsightedness was a small spot in the middle of the lens, which gave me a sort of tunnel vision. Things straight ahead were clear but things off to the side were fuzzy... and they didn't have to be all that far to the side. Walking down a hallway was almost dizzying.

My solution was to get Lasik surgery. I did it in 2002 and am still delighted with the results. I have to wear reading glasses for up close stuff but don't need glasses otherwise. I generally do not need glasses at a computer or even reading the newspaper, but food labels and any close detail work needs reading glasses. It's definitely not a problem and something that everyone runs into when they drift into their late 40s.

Between progressive glasses and Lasik, I'd do Lasik again in a heartbeat.

--Bob

I have had to wear bifocals for 15 years. Before that I had worn regular glasses for 10 years before that.

The first bifocals I wore were progressive. They aren't hard to get used to at all. It took me less than a day.

Two years ago I had a run of bad luck & had to get help from the United Way to get glasses. They wouldn't pay for progressive so I had to get bifocals with lines.

I had an awful time with them. It took me forever to get used to them. I had to keep looking up & down to get the right angle. The eye strain was terrible.

If you have a chance to get progressive lenses, by all means do so.

RudiXeno said…

Good news!  I wear them and there's not much to get used to.  My glasses have 3 zones.  Close, mid-range and distance.  When I look through the lenses straight on I get distance.  If I lower my eyes a bit I can see my speedometer or screen on my laptop perfectly.  If I look lower I find I can read just about anything.

Maybe it took all of 3 days fr them to work for me seamlessly.

If I intend to read a book for a few hours, I generally take my glasses off entirely.

Whenever I'm not wearing my contacts I wear my progressive lense eyeglasses.  Progressive contacts?  Have had them but found they were more troublesome than helpful.

---

That is so good to read. I am nervous about the glasses. More so that I have an astigmatism and I feel very off balance when wearing glasses to correct it. That and glasses with three levels? ACK. My husband has progressives and it took him a week and he's fine. He doesn't wear them all the time but he has no issues.

I will also get contacts that are not progressive because my right eye is my far away eye and my left is my close up one so I need a prescription that makes the right see close and the left see far. Oddly, together they work just fine. Or so it seems until I correct them in some way and I realize I don't  really see all that fine afterall.

We'll soon see if I can handle the glasses. Luckily my insurance pays for them.

I think I am a bad candidate for LASIK because I have dry eyes but would be willing to do it IF they perfected the astigmatism surgery which I don't think they have yet.

Let me weigh in as a former Certified Ophthalmic Technician.  Progressive lenses ARE bifocals without the lines.  Because of the way they are made, they really are a tri-focal.  They have a real advantage over the old bifocal in that 1.  there is no line to make you look or feel "old" and 2. the lens gradually changes from top to bottom to make it easier on the patient.

I have a pair that I wear when I'm not wearing my contacts.  Truth is EVERY person, by age 45, needs a little help reading small print.  I've met the occasional person who was able to stave it off until age 50 or so, but, it is just part of the natural aging process, with the lens in your eye not being able to contract as much as it used to to help you read at near.  Near-sighted people can usually just take their glasses off and read, but far-sighted people are just screwed and will have to have the progressives or bifocal, because taking their glasses off just makes the problem worse.

Me, I still wear contacts and don't need reading glasses. I also have astigmatism.  The reason I don't need reading glasses is I do what is known as a "mono-fit".  My dominate eye wears a distance contact lens (I'm near-sighted) and my other eye wears a contact lens that is undercorrected by about +1.75 diopters.  So, I see far away with my left eye and read at near with my right eye. Took about a week to get used to and I've been doing that for about 7 years.  There are certain things that can cause a person not to be able to tolerate that, but most (about 70%) do very well with it.

I don't know your situation exactly enough to say if you can handle it, but, if you don't want glasses and would rather have contacts, that's one way to go.  If you want the glasses, well progressives are leaps and bounds above the old "lined" bifocal and you will adjust to them in no time...:)

Next up..in about 30 years or so...."so you have cataracts!"...:)

RudiXeno said…

Good news!  I wear them and there's not much to get used to.  My glasses have 3 zones.  Close, mid-range and distance.  When I look through the lenses straight on I get distance.  If I lower my eyes a bit I can see my speedometer or screen on my laptop perfectly.  If I look lower I find I can read just about anything.

Maybe it took all of 3 days fr them to work for me seamlessly.

If I intend to read a book for a few hours, I generally take my glasses off entirely.

Whenever I'm not wearing my contacts I wear my progressive lense eyeglasses.  Progressive contacts?  Have had them but found they were more troublesome than helpful.

---

Yeah, progressive contacts tend to be a compromise and and work nearly as well as the glasses.  The mono-fit works GREAT for me.

---

That is so good to read. I am nervous about the glasses. More so that I have an astigmatism and I feel very off balance when wearing glasses to correct it. That and glasses with three levels? ACK. My husband has progressives and it took him a week and he's fine. He doesn't wear them all the time but he has no issues.

I will also get contacts that are not progressive because my right eye is my far away eye and my left is my close up one so I need a prescription that makes the right see close and the left see far. Oddly, together they work just fine. Or so it seems until I correct them in some way and I realize I don't  really see all that fine afterall.

We'll soon see if I can handle the glasses. Luckily my insurance pays for them.

I think I am a bad candidate for LASIK because I have dry eyes but would be willing to do it IF they perfected the astigmatism surgery which I don't think they have yet.

---