posted on September 28, 2009 at 11:32AM
I do think it says something about our society.
A few years ago the Championship Northwestern women's lacrosse squad was invited to the White House. When their picture with the President appeared on the team's website showing four players in flip flops, a brother of one of the players fired off an email to his sister that said, "YOU WORE FLIP-FLOPS TO THE WHITE HOUSE???!!!" The Chicago Tribune ran an article about whether flip-flops were appropriate for formal occasions and it started the great "flip flop" debate... There seemed to be a disconnect between what was appropriate dress for an invitation to the White House.
Until recently, presidents have shown respect for the oval office by always wearing a jacket and tie in it. I guess that is why some took offense when a picture of the current president was shown in a white shirt talking on the phone with his feet propped up on the desk of the oval office. I have wondered why it was such a big deal but I have decided that it boils down to decorum and respect. In short, it simply is not dignified. [I think that his behavior was short lived because I haven't seen any more negative press in that regard. We are all entitled to a few gaffes now and then.]
I realize that times change and so do social mores but some things do not go out of style and I think that is respect for ones self, respect for others and respect for positions and occasions that require it.
This topic was prompted by watching pictures of the heads of state and their spouses at the recent G-20 Summit. It struck me odd that our First Lady wore a dress that was bare shouldered, open backed and open in front so that nearly half of her upper body was naked. It was a stark contrast to the simple black, modest dress worn by the French president's wife, Carla Bruni Sarkozy and the stately attire of the other spouses. It made me wonder what the world is thinking about us.
In some parts of the world, modesty is highly prized and American women have been criticized for being loose, whorelike and crass. [Having lived overseas I am sensitive to this perception.] These remarmerican women and not meant to criticize our First Lady- From what I could tell from the press, she was gracious and acted every bit the way a First Lady should act...
I was recently in Montreal with a friend. We had attended a function that required us to be dressed in dresses and hose. We went into town for lunch and chose to sit outside. As we talked and dined we couldn't help but notice that the women were dressed, for the most part, in skirts. The few that were in slacks wore nice, fashionable slacks. They looked nice. There was an air of refinement that wouldn't have been there if they all had worn jeans and old sweatshirts. The experience gave us both pause to reflect on our own dress. Since then, I have kicked my dress up a notch from my usual jeans and nice shirt.
I am certainly not advocating that we go back to Mrs. Cleaver days [although I am noticing more and more women wearing pearls- ha!] but I think the pendulum has swung too far in one direction and should probably settle somewhere in the middle.