<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Latest reviews about Popular Science </title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-reviews</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Latest reviews about Popular Science </description>
    <item>
      <title>Mopsa says &quot;Popular Science: Great Magazine for a scientific dummy&quot; about Popular Science</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-80a4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Popular Science is a great magazine for scientific dummies. The articles make reading the science perfectly clear. I would never have read Popular Science if I had not inhearited the subscription from my deceased father. Even then I gave it away until one day I had read everything in the house except Popular Science. So in desparation I read it and found I liked the magazine very much. As always with magazines I like the regulars section of Popular Science the best where you get short blurbs that leave you wanting to know more. I particularly like the section &quot;What's New&quot; which tells about the newest scientific items on the block. I am always amazed at what is out there. I particularly like the article about reseach in viruses and bacteria. I am very knowledgeable about the 1918 Pandemic. I am always looking for updated material on what virus and bacteria are doing. I also enjoy reading about the chemical scene in terms of what is happening to our bodies and planet as a result of the chemical...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-80a4</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mopsa</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>flyinbryan says &quot;Great Info&quot; about Popular Science</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-e4dd0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Popular Science is geek stuff for the not so geeky. What I mean is that it has great tech information on products and ideas out there, but it is written for the layman so we don't need a dictionary to read the darn thing. Keep up the great work guys and help us not so smart get a little education. &lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:42:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-e4dd0</guid>
      <dc:creator>flyinbryan</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TheBard says &quot;My new personal science and technology advisor &quot; about Popular Science</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-408e0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have always delved into the minutia of how things work.&#160; This natural curiosity grew from, where I don't know where it comes from exactly.&#160; Perhaps it part of the male brain, or perhaps just part of mine; I like to take things apart and see how they work.&#160; It's not enough to know that if I pay my electric bill on time, when I flick on a light switch I will have light; I want to know how the electricity is generated and how it got to the switch.&#160; That same curiosity led me to my current profession as an Information Technology professional.&#160; What started out as a hobby, a need to know how computers worked, has turned into a second career for me.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Viewpoint &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of this explains why I subscribe to and read &lt;strong&gt;Popular Science&lt;/strong&gt; Magazine (http://www.popsci.com/popsci/), whose slogan is &lt;em&gt;The Future Is Now&lt;/em&gt;.&#160; As magazines go, &lt;strong&gt;Popular Science&lt;/strong&gt; is a pretty thin rag, but that does not mean the monthly is not packed with all manner of useful and informative information.&#160; It does mean that the...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Popular-Science-review-408e0</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheBard</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
