<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Latest reviews about National Review Magazine </title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/National-Review-Magazine-reviews</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Latest reviews about National Review Magazine </description>
    <item>
      <title>Bryan-Carey says &quot;Conservative Commentary Brought to You Bi- Weekly &quot; about National Review Magazine</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/National-Review-Magazine-review-3de8</link>
      <description>&#160; &lt;p&gt;National Review is an intelligent magazine that was founded back in 1955 by conservative commentator William F. Buckley, Jr. It has been going strong ever since, with a bi- weekly offering of articles that are timely, direct, and almost always one- sided in their defense of all things conservative. You won't find a sympathetic article about the Hillary Clinton run for the White House or a balanced article about socialized health care. No, what you read in National Review is 100 percent conservative and it rarely sways from its political course. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One criticism that has been leveled at National Review from conservatives, however, is its slightly altered direction. It often departs from its traditional conservative stand to one more inclined to support the neo- conservatism of George W. Bush and others like him. This is partially true, and I do get a little irritated with National Review's tendency to support Bush, Cheney, and other neocons regardless of the facts; most important among them...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/National-Review-Magazine-review-3de8</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bryan-Carey</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
