<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Latest reviews about HD Radio Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio HD</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/HD-Radio-Boston-Acoustics-Receptor-Radio-HD-reviews</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Latest reviews about HD Radio Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio HD</description>
    <item>
      <title>BiggLarr says &quot;Horrible Reception Without The Di-Pole Antenna&quot; about HD Radio Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio HD</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/HD-Radio-Boston-Acoustics-Receptor-Radio-HD-review-a2c60</link>
      <description>The Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio HD has a nice, compact, modern look.&#160; It produces quality sound with excellent bass response for a radio with such a small footprint.&#160; It should, however, include a built-in CD player considering the $300 price tag.&#160; The radio does include a port to plug in a CD player or MP3 player.&#160; With the smaller FM antenna supplied, I was unable to pick up many of the locally broadcast HD signals even though I live at a relatively high elevation just&#160;nine miles from downtown Pittsburgh.&#160; The di-pole antenna was able to pick up those stations very well, but the di-pole antenna itself is huge (seven feet tall and wide) and ugly and was impossible for me to hide.&#160; I had to return the radio.... </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/HD-Radio-Boston-Acoustics-Receptor-Radio-HD-review-a2c60</guid>
      <dc:creator>BiggLarr</dc:creator>
      <rating>2</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brooklyn77 says &quot;Cool, but Probably Unnecessary&quot; about HD Radio Boston Acoustics Receptor Radio HD</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/HD-Radio-Boston-Acoustics-Receptor-Radio-HD-review-6c99</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HD Radio Background:&lt;/strong&gt;&#160; HD radio is as unnecessary as it is cool.&#160; HD radio is supposed to have better sound quality&#160;relative to&#160;non-HD radios, though I can't quite pick up the difference.&#160; HD radio's key&#160;benefit is that it provides users with MORE access to their favorite local stations.&#160; &quot;Huh?,&quot; you may say.&#160; Well,&#160;most of your local&#160;favorites also have other stations that are only available in HD (for example, 93.1 AND 93.12, etc.).&#160; While these&#160;'extra' HD stations&#160;may thematically&#160;align with their terrestrial brethren, these other 'only available in HD' stations do not carry advertising and are a little less 'commercial' in what they broadcast.&#160; As with all radio,&#160;HD is regulated by&#160;government and currently ads are not allowed on HD stations.&#160; In this sense, HD is a bit like satellite (although not nearly as content robust).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boston Acoustics HD Radio:&lt;/strong&gt;&#160; The Boston Acoustics HD radio is very nice looking.&#160; It is quite portable, although does not run on batteries.&#160; It...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/HD-Radio-Boston-Acoustics-Receptor-Radio-HD-review-6c99</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brooklyn77</dc:creator>
      <rating>3</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
