<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reviews by jenbx</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/aboutme/jenbx</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Reviews by jenbx</description>
    <item>
      <title>jenbx says &quot;i want one so bad&quot; about Toshiba - 52HL167 52 in. HDTV LCD Television</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Toshiba-52HL167-52-in-HDTV-LCD-Television-review-565a2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;my bf has one hes so in love with it he almost killed cuz i moved it a lil i love the tv tho&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, for the TV. I have always been a fan of Toshiba products and while everyone else was looking at Samsung, Sharp and Sony LCDs, I was confident that for the money Toshiba would come up wtih a TV I would not be disappointed in. In fact, now that I have it hooked up to Time Warner HD the question is what would the more expensive version of the TV really give me? If you agree Hockey in HD is about as good a test of motion on a LCD, then all I can say is I cannot see the flaws, if any, from twelve feet away. And, the color settings were more than satisfactory out-of-the-box. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I enjoy video, and movies in-particular, and am more than happy with this purchase. I would have spent more if necessary for a better picture, but is a more expensive LCD really going to be better? &lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Toshiba-52HL167-52-in-HDTV-LCD-Television-review-565a2</guid>
      <dc:creator>jenbx</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
