<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reviews about Lenses</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Lenses</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Reviews about Lenses</description>
    <item>
      <title>donnaolm says &quot;Great Travel Lens&quot; about Nikon - 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR DX Lens</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Nikon-18-200mm-f-3-5-5-6-G-ED-IF-AF-S-VR-DX-Lens-review-5d514</link>
      <description>We do a lot of traveling and I've found that the Nikon D80 with the 18-200 VR lens are all I need to pack. I love the versitility of the lens combined with the speed of the camera.&#160; On all our trips the only time I've needed a lens with more zoom was on a wildlife trek, otherwise the 18-200 meets all my needs. When you are trying to pack light it's helpful not to have to drag along several lens.&#160; I love the VR (vibration reduction) feature of this lens. The only complaint I have is when you are taking flash photos with the builting flash on the D80, the length causes a shadow when trying to capture a group photo. Easy enough to crop out if you keep in mind the lower portion of your photo is going to have a shadow when framing the shot.... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Nikon-18-200mm-f-3-5-5-6-G-ED-IF-AF-S-VR-DX-Lens-review-5d514</guid>
      <dc:creator>donnaolm</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>deja2004 says &quot;The EF 100-400 is simply awesome!&quot; about Canon - EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM Lens</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6-IS-USM-Lens-review-9bcf2</link>
      <description>What an awesome lens! I have been extremely pleased with the quality and sharpness of the Canon EF 100-400 USM IS. That image stabalizer has allowed me to shoot in lower light situations than with my old lenses. I have wanted this lens since it originally came out and finally purchased it a few months ago. There are only 2 things I can think of that I really don't like about the lens, though. 1. It's heavy. I mean really heavy. Especially after carrying it around all day. Tip: it comes with a lens case. Discard the strap that comes with it and go spend a few bucks on a wider strap that will be more comfortable. 2. Canon really needs to come out with a handle that screws into the lens' tripod mount. It would make it easier to stabalize when carrying a tripod or monopod is not convenient.... </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6-IS-USM-Lens-review-9bcf2</guid>
      <dc:creator>deja2004</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>noriravi says &quot;Perfect travel lens with very nice zoom range&quot; about Canon - EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM Lens</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6-IS-USM-Lens-review-6a7e2</link>
      <description>One of the most conterversial lenses offered by Canon. I have owned three copies of this lens over the period of 5 years and each of them performed perfectly. Producing sharp image even wide open. I have test my current copy with the Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L lens and the two lenses produced images that were similar in sharpness and contrast. I duely sold my 400mm prime lens. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This lens along with the 17-40 and 24-105 complete the entire zoom range required for any normal travel photography with out breaking your back and fits nicely into any medium sized camera bag.&lt;br/&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-100-400mm-f-4-5-5-6-IS-USM-Lens-review-6a7e2</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriravi</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>noriravi says &quot;Great travel lens for hiking and landscape photography&quot; about Canon - EF 24-105 f/4 L IS</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-24-105-f-4-L-IS-review-87ad</link>
      <description>A relatively new offering from Canon, the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS lens is a light weight high performance lens that works perfectly for light weight backpacking or hiking. With the built in IS I can get up to 3 stops of extra hand holdability. I have created very sharp images using this lens at 1/6th of a second exposure. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The lens works perfectly as a travel lens for me along with my 17-40 /f4 and 100-400 f/4.5-56 L IS lenses.&lt;br/&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-24-105-f-4-L-IS-review-87ad</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriravi</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>noriravi says &quot;Works very well for landscape photography&quot; about Canon - EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Lens</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-17-40mm-f-4L-USM-Lens-review-d6c2</link>
      <description>There is a lot of negative reviews about this lens on the internet. The lens performs very well for what I use it for, namely landscape photography. I have tested this lens against the more expensive offerings from Canon (16-35) and the 17-40 performs very well at f/8 and beyond. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If your primary use of the lens is for landscape photography I can stronly recommed this lens but if you are lookign to shoot wide open with this lens you will be better off with the 16-35.&lt;br/&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-EF-17-40mm-f-4L-USM-Lens-review-d6c2</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriravi</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>noriravi says &quot;One of the best canon lenses for the EOS body&quot; about Canon - TS-E 90mm f/2.8</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-TS-E-90mm-f-2-8-review-de6d0</link>
      <description>I hve owned this lens for over 5 years. This is one of the best canon lenses made for the EOS body. I use this for macro work and compressed landscape photography. It is a manual focus lens so works best with full frame camera. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have used this lens with the 1.6 crop factor cameras but fousing was a pain. The lens is very sharp wide open.... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Canon-TS-E-90mm-f-2-8-review-de6d0</guid>
      <dc:creator>noriravi</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>chuckster says &quot;One lens to rule them all&quot; about Tamron - 18 to 200</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Tamron-18-to-200-review-9e0a2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You can travel with a bag full of lenses, or you can travel with one. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love photography, but I don't want to be one of those guys who travels with a giant bag of lenses - especially since I do a lot of traveling in exotic locations where your luggage space and carry-on can be a challenge. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me, the ideal solution has been to trade off a bit of performance for a single lens with an extremely adaptable zoom. Back when I was using film, I had a Tamron that was about 25 to 300 mm, IIRC, but it was build to Minolta. When I switched to a Canon digital, I wanted to build on that and bought a Tamron 18 to 200 zoom. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's been as versatile as I expected, letting me zoom in on animals in Africa or shot wide cityscapes in China (if you don't mind the smog in the way, of course). It's been very durable, with a few bumps and a fair amount of rain not bothering it. The few times I've flipped to manual focus, it's been easy to use. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;The one thing is that compared to separate lenses it is both pretty...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Tamron-18-to-200-review-9e0a2</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckster</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cat says &quot;The Holy Grail of Wide Angles? Maybe Not&quot; about Sigma - 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Sigma-12-24mm-f-4-5-5-6-EX-DG-HSM-review-c22e</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;About the Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX Aspherical DG HSM Autofocus Lens&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Whew! That's a mouthful. I'm new to camera lens reviews so first let's go through what all of those numbers and letters that look like half an Algebra equation mean. If you're a seasoned camera pro, feel free to skip this section and head straight to the technical specs below. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First, about the brand: Sigma Corporation of America is one of many well-known lens manufacturers for SLR cameras. They also make the Sigma SD10, a Foveon-based chipset digital camera - technology that makes me drool, but isn't mainstream enough for me to adopt just yet. So, Sigma knows cameras, and they know optics. I trust the Sigma brand to deliver a solid performing lens. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;12-24mm f/4.5-5.6:&lt;/strong&gt; The lens is classified as an &quot;ultra wide-angle&quot; lens at 12-24mm. With the 1.6 multiplier the lens is approximately around 19-38mm in standard camera lens terms. The &lt;em&gt;maximum aperture&lt;/em&gt; that this lens is capable of is f/4.5 to f/5.6 at 12 to 24mm respectively....&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Sigma-12-24mm-f-4-5-5-6-EX-DG-HSM-review-c22e</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
