<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reviews by audiopro</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/aboutme/audiopro</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Reviews by audiopro</description>
    <item>
      <title>audiopro says "Best Bang for the Buck" about Tascam - DM-4800 Music Recording Mixer</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Tascam-DM-4800-Music-Recording-Mixer-review-51bb0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I recently visited a friends newly remodled Studio to help with a CD Mix and got to use the Tascam DM-4800.&#160; What a treat!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, this mixer is not for the casual user.&#160; It does take some time to learn to access all the available functions, but once you do, you'll realize it wasn't wasted time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I began my years as a Recording Engineer the latest thing in mixing was early "Automation" for mixing.&#160; That was handy in the fact that all fader gains in the mix were stored on one track of the multi-track (called "Striping").&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, you could build a Drum mix on a song and record the data on the "Data Track".&#160; Go back to the front of the&#160;song and work with the rest of the mix, say....Bass, Guitars, Keys, ect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At this point, the Drums would be in the "Read" mode (your previous mix) and the other tracks would be in the "Write" mode.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This way, you could build your mix a section at a time, and the Automation would remember the Fader Gains of each section as you go.&#160; Cool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only problem...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Tascam-DM-4800-Music-Recording-Mixer-review-51bb0</guid>
      <dc:creator>audiopro</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>audiopro says "Most used Mic in the World" about Shure - SM57-LC Professional Microphone</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Shure-SM57-LC-Professional-Microphone-review-3f064</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been making money with Music since the mid 60's.&#160; No, I don't use a walker to get around, I got an early start.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Shure SM-57 in one form or another has been around for as long as I can remember, and from my&#160; experience, has to be the most popular and versitle mic in the World.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have worked as an Audio Engineer (Live and Recording), a musician and vocalist.&#160; The SM-57 has always been there.&#160; In all those years making Music, I can't name one gig, Live or Recording, where I haven't used a 57 for something, if not for many things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure (no pun), there are many, many mics, past and present, with better frequency response and dynamics, but for sheer sonic guts and dependability, the SM-57 is hard to beat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Recording Studios, Mics are plentiful to say the least.&#160; Even so, I have (along with many engineers) never used anything but the SM-57 on Snare Drum.&#160; Often on Rack Toms as well.&#160; When it comes to micing a guitar amp, my first choice is a Neumann KM-84 Condenser......to a certian...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Shure-SM57-LC-Professional-Microphone-review-3f064</guid>
      <dc:creator>audiopro</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
