<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet media="screen" type="text/xsl" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reviews by Pokdo</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/aboutme/Pokdo</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Reviews by Pokdo</description>
    <item>
      <title>Pokdo says &quot;Pretty Good after one month&quot; about Summer Infant Handheld Color Video Monitor</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Summer-Infant-Handheld-color-video-monitor-review-47b86</link>
      <description>We bought this monitor when our child transitioned to a bed from a crib. We used a Graco digital monitor for the first 2 years and that worked fine with the occasional beeping due to interference. We have a wireless internet system and a 6.0 DECT cordless phone. We also had a 2.4 Ghz analog cordless phone. Right away we set up the Summer Infant video monitor in the room along with old Graco digital monitor. We had a lot of static and interference. We still experienced static and interference when we moved the Graco monitor out of the room. We planned to use the Summer Infant video monitor in the older child's room and the old Graco digital monitor in the new baby's room so we wanted to test them together. It was worst around the 2.4 Ghz phone so we got rid of the phone immediately. The static and interference went on for a week. We then replaced the Graco digital monitor with an older monitor (2 years), Safety First 49 MHz technology, 400 ft range monitor. We had this at grandparents house....... </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:20:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Summer-Infant-Handheld-color-video-monitor-review-47b86</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pokdo</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
