<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet media="screen" type="text/xsl" href="/stylesheets/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Reviews by Aleric67</title>
    <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/aboutme/Aleric67</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:35:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Reviews by Aleric67</description>
    <item>
      <title>Aleric67 says &quot;Battle Cards meets Stratego&quot; about Playstation 2 - Yu-Gi-Oh! War of the Roses</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Playstation-2-Yu-Gi-Oh-War-of-the-Roses-review-0f7b3</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Remember the strategy game 'Stratego'?&#160; You move your pieces across the board trying to capture your opponents pieces, Not knowing if they were of higher or lower value than yours.&#160; This same style goes into &quot;Yu-Gi-Oh!, Duelists of the Roses&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#160;In this game you are fighting the most pivotal war in English history; The War of the Roses.&#160; But instead of regular battles you are playing battle cards instead.&#160; But this game differs greatly from your standard battle card game.&#160; You don't simply lay out your cards in a row in front of you.&#160; And you don't just pick an opponent's card to attack.&#160; You have to move them into position to attack.&#160;&#160; This is a key element in the strategy of the game, in that you never really know what cards you might be attacking.&#160; In regular Battle Cards, you know which rows are monsters, and which ones are spells and traps.&#160; In this game, it could be anything placed anywhere.&#160; Adds a note of mystery and surprise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another key strategic element is the point...&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:35:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Playstation-2-Yu-Gi-Oh-War-of-the-Roses-review-0f7b3</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aleric67</dc:creator>
      <rating>4</rating>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aleric67 says &quot;What the Resident Evil story should have been.&quot; about Capcom - PS2 - Resident Evil 4</title>
      <link>http://www.viewpoints.com/Capcom-PS2-Resident-Evil-4-review-514d</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have constantly heard about how &quot;Resident Evil&quot;&#160; was the ultimate in survival horror.&#160; And I have to agree with the assesment.&#160; Although it doesn't have the creep factor of say, a 'Silent Hill', or a &quot;Fatal Exposure&quot;, it more than makes up for it in it's action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The storyline is deep and detailed.&#160; And the game makes full use of the entire game controller.&#160; No tjust one or two buttons.&#160; Plus the puzzles are pretty straight forward.&#160; I always puzzles where you don't know if there 'is' a puzzle.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only problem I ever had was with the controller action.&#160; At one point you have to avoid headshots.&#160; (play the game to find out why)&#160; I tried to take out one guy with a shot to the leg.&#160; Even had the laser scope pointed at his shin.&#160; Pulled the trigger, and his head exploded.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, I highly recommend this game.&lt;/p&gt;... </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.viewpoints.com/Capcom-PS2-Resident-Evil-4-review-514d</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aleric67</dc:creator>
      <rating>5</rating>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
