2009 Advisor
MikeMaroon
Chattanooga, TN

Gonna be doing one thing and one thing only....killing NAH-zees!

5 star rating

fun loving, a movie buff, into action flicks, Lover of quirky, unique films
Pros

    Another fine Quintin Tarentino film, Great script, Very entertaining

Cons
    not really believable, cartoonish at times

AUG
27
2009

If you've ever seen a Quentin Tarantino film, you know you can describe them in many ways, but one adjective that never applies is "subtle".  His latest, Inglourious Basterds, suffers no lapses in that department.  What it is, though, is pretty good revisionist history entertainment.

Seeming to take at least some of his inspiration from spaghetti westerns, in particular The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly, Tarentino has re-created history as we would like to have seen it, a WWII with the Germans afraid of the Jews, and for good reason.  I mean, let's face it, the one group of people you can relentlessly slaughter in a movie and raise the objection of no one is the Nazis.  Or, as Indiana Jones so famously said of them, "I hate those guys."

Inglourious Basterds opens to the beautiful scenery of the French countryside in 1941.  The occupied French countryside, and more specifically at the home of a dairy farmer, Pierre LaPadite (Denis Menochet) and his three lovely daughters.  Soon he comes face to face with Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), better known as "The Jew Hunter", who is there to question him about an unaccounted for local Jewish Family.   Because they don't call him "The Jew Hunter" for no reason, Landa soon finds the missing family through his unique interrogation of LaPadite.  Now, most movies featuring different nationalities cheat and just have everyone speak English, often with the accent of their native country.  Not Tarantino.  He begins the film with all parties speaking their native tongue, then gives them a viable excuse to switch to English. Pretty clever. It is this ruse that also allows Landa to expose this hiding family without alerting them, until it is too late for them, of course.   But, he doesn't manage to kill all of them and a teenage girl Shosanna, escapes.  They will meet again.

In the meantime, American 1st Lieutenant Aldo Raine(Brad Pitt)[Aldo Ray, anyone?], a good ole ex-moonshine runnin'  boy from Maynardville, Tennessee, is putting a special ops group together who will be known as "Inglourious Basterds".  Their sole mission?  As the thickly southern accented Raine says, "..we're gonna be doin' one thing and one thing only....killin' NAH-zees".  But that's not all.  Lt. Raine is aka "Aldo the Apache".  The reason for that colorful moniker soon becomes clear.  He orders his men to scalp every Nazi they kill, supplying the good Lt. with 100 Nazi scalps each, 800 in all.  And, every one of the 8 men in his outfit have ample motive to brutalize these German bullies.  The group is made up of Jewish-Americans.

So, this rag-tag band of soldiers is dropped behind enemy lines to strike terror into the hearts of Nazi Germany.  And they succeed, gloriously, or inglouriously.  They are almost like an American Robin Hood and his band of Merry Men, except instead of robbing the Nazis of their money, they take their lives. And their scalps.  They become the bane of Hitler himself as they terrorize(ironically they are later referred to as terrorists by Col. Landa) the German Army, always leaving one soldier alive and with a Swastika carved into their forehead to let the rest of them know, "we're comin' for ya".

As more and more Nazis die at the hands of the Basterds a plot is unhatched by the British that, if successful, could wipe out the entire Nazi high command, to include Hitler. British General Fenech (Mike Myers.  Yep, THAT Mike Myers) and Winston Churchill (Rod Taylor) have cooked up this plot involving a turncoat famous German actress, Briget von Hammersmark(Diane Kruger), the Basterds and a Paris cinema selected by the Nazi Joseph Goebbels for the premiere of his latest propaganda film, A Nation's Pride, starring a  young sniper turned actor, Frederick Zoller (Daniel Bruhl).

Unbeknownst to them, the owner of this cinema is cooking up a plot of their own against the Nazis.  And it is strictly for revenge.  So, as the British and the Basterds plot to blow up the cinema during the film, the theater owner plans to burn it down with everyone inside.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Say whatever you will about Quentin Tarentino, the man knows how to churn out unique and entertaining films.  As is oft the case, his direction is frequently over-the-top and the film laced with blood-letting, though I found none of it gratuitous.  The characters are sometimes cartoonish (especially Hitler) but always enjoyable to watch.  On the other hand, he doesn't wholly demonize all German soldiers, taking the opportunity a couple of times to remind us the rank and file were largely scared young men fearfully following orders.  The upper echelon?  Complete monsters deserving of whatever comeuppance they get.

Christoph Waltz is probably deserving of Oscar consideration for his charming yet utterly sinister Waffen-SS officer and Brad Pitt, well, he's proven yet again he deserves to be ranked right up there with our best American actors.  And for every cartoonish portrayal, there are 2 or 3 fine performances.

Where any Quintin Tarantino movie usually excels is dialogue and Inglourious Basterds is no different. In each of the five acts (Tarantino separates them as such), the scripts crackles and moves right along, in-spite of a couple scenes that might be views by some as "slow spots".  Inglourious Basterds (Tarentio hasn't explained the extra "u" in the first word but says he spelled the second "like people say it") isn't perfect but it is very, very entertaining. We all sorta know how the movie is going to end from the very beginning, but Tarantino throws a couple of surprises at us during the climax, so it's not completely predictable. But, it's history as we wish it could have been. The main protagonists are bigger than life and the real bastards finally get what they deserve.  That's more than alright with me. GRADE: A-

Last edited on Aug 27, 2009



I_thumb_up Inglourious Basterds is recommended by MikeMaroon

24
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about MikeMaroon’s Review

 


MikeMaroon wrote on Sep 27, 2009 at 4:06PM

In response to TaraLee's comment from Sep 27, 2009 at 11:53AM:

Well thanks! This is one of my fave movies of the year. You might just enjoy it!

TaraLee wrote on Sep 27, 2009 at 11:53AM

I usually can not stand QT movies, but your review makes me want to give this one a chance. Nice job!

MikeMaroon wrote on Sep 11, 2009 at 4:52AM

In response to darlyn63's comment from Sep 11, 2009 at 1:52AM:

Sure. Linear, in this case means, in a straight line, chronologically. Pulp Fiction, for example, jumped alll over the place timewise, from the present, to the past, to the future, and so on. In terms of this movie, I meant it to let people know the plot moves along chronologically in order.

darlyn63 wrote on Sep 11, 2009 at 1:52AM

In response to MikeMaroon's comment from Sep 1, 2009 at 4:51PM:

Hi Mike,
Look I am finally getting back to you. You know the ol'saying, better late than never. (But then maybe I did get back to you and just don't recall). My days are running into each other anymore. I know this may sound stupid but what does "linear" mean? Today could be my day to learn something new.....right? I saw clips from the movie, looks interesting....now I just need to know what the word means....lol...Thanks!

PattyTherre wrote on Sep 1, 2009 at 7:37PM

Whooo look at the Helpful Votes! Now that's what I'm talking about! Great review!

gitbean wrote on Sep 1, 2009 at 5:47PM

GREAT GREAT GREAT review! I plan to see it this weekend (or play hookie tomorrow and see it...LOL)!

MikeMaroon wrote on Sep 1, 2009 at 4:51PM

In response to darlyn63's comment from Sep 1, 2009 at 6:50AM:

Well, if it will make you feel better, this film is a bit more linear than Pulp Fiction, which in my opinion is Tarantino's masterpiece. Thanks for the compliment!

darlyn63 wrote on Sep 1, 2009 at 7:08AM

See, It came to me, Pulp Fiction!

darlyn63 wrote on Sep 1, 2009 at 6:50AM

Very good review Mike. Not sure if I could follow the movie. The last movie I watched of Tarantino's was, now it's on the tip of my tongue and having a brain fart moment. John Travolta was in it. I had a hard time following it, back and forth. My son loves that movie, the title will come to me soon as I am done writing.
You wrote very well on this movie, almost makes me want to see it.
hmmmmm.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:35PM

In response to Meredith's comment from Aug 31, 2009 at 10:58AM:

Thanks, ma'am! Tarantino is all about the witty banter, ain't he? Yeah, Pitt was a little over-the-top and you could tell he was having a blast. Moonshine??? Moonshine??? What EVER are you talking about??? Psstt...uncle lou..pass that Ball jar!!!

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:34PM

In response to BubleFan1's comment from Aug 31, 2009 at 6:59AM:

Hope you like it! I was mightily entertained!

Meredith wrote on Aug 31, 2009 at 10:58AM

Loved your review, Mike. I also LOVED the movie. So, so entertaining and actually quite funny... the witty banter had me laughing out loud. I'm personally not a huge fan of violence and blood spillage but thought this movie had to include it. Felt it was refreshing to see a Tarantino movie that didn't have ninjas and swords. Totally agree that Christoph Waltz is very deserving of an Oscar for his performance. Him and Brad pretty much made the movie for me.

How 'bout ole Bradley playing a hillbilly from Tennessee?! Hilarious and I can totally identify... he reminded me of my uncle. Moonshine is still flowing in the mountains of NC as I'm sure it is in TN :)

BubleFan1 wrote on Aug 31, 2009 at 6:59AM

I am/was hesitant. I was ready to skip it until my honey said "lets see it!" and now your excellent review.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 30, 2009 at 5:19PM

In response to loveofnight's comment from Aug 30, 2009 at 4:14PM:

I think I need to see it again. Thanks for reading!

loveofnight wrote on Aug 30, 2009 at 4:14PM

this is one that i haven't seen but i may give it a go

AngelaWLaFon wrote on Aug 30, 2009 at 12:50AM

"On the other hand, he doesn't wholly demonize all German soldiers, taking the opportunity a couple of times to remind us the rank and file were largely scared young men fearfully following orders. The upper echelon? Complete monsters deserving of whatever comeuppance they get." Awesome insight and another entertaining review. It will probably have to be on DVD but I think this one would be worth our time.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 8:56PM

In response to GigiandAdonai's comment from Aug 29, 2009 at 8:16PM:

Gigi, I am POSTIVE this film is not for you! LOL....but I loved it, as you can tell. Looking forward to what I'm sure will be your most excellent review of The Time Traveler's Wife.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 8:46PM

In response to RudiXeno's comment from Aug 29, 2009 at 10:15AM:

Cool! Let me know what you think, even if you wind up not agreeing with me!!

GigiandAdonai wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 8:16PM

Great movie review but I don't think this is for me. I went to see The Time Traveler's Wife last night ;+)

RudiXeno wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 10:15AM

Sold! I've decided to go see this movie tonight. Great review Mike.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 7:45AM

In response to LaurieM's comment from Aug 29, 2009 at 12:39AM:

Thank YOU for taking the time to read and comment!!!

LaurieM wrote on Aug 29, 2009 at 12:39AM

I was wondering about this movie! Thank you for a detailed review without ruining it for us who haven't seen it yet!

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 28, 2009 at 10:34PM

In response to this2shallpass19's comment from Aug 27, 2009 at 6:28PM:

It was funny frequently and over-the-top, but never to the point of stupidity.....Tarantino is a master at that. He pulls up just short of the "stupid" line.

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 28, 2009 at 10:33PM

In response to krislynn's comment from Aug 28, 2009 at 3:38PM:

Let me know how you like it!!

MikeMaroon wrote on Aug 28, 2009 at 10:33PM

In response to Fardreamer's comment from Aug 27, 2009 at 7:22PM:

Thanks!

krislynn wrote on Aug 28, 2009 at 3:38PM

I was wondering if this movie was any good. You answered that question. Thank so much for the review! ;-)

Fardreamer wrote on Aug 27, 2009 at 7:22PM

Nice review, Mike!

this2shallpass19 wrote on Aug 27, 2009 at 6:28PM

This looks funny and stupid at the same time! I like Brad, so I'll probably have to watch it :)