Wikipedia.com

Wikipedia.com Reviews


www.wikipedia.com



Overall 3.5 star rating3.57 of 5 (by 35 users)



Wikipedia.com Review Summary

Want to look up some quick facts on a specific subject or topic? If so, then Wikipedia makes a good source for a quick fact search. Wikipedia is an on- line encyclopedia loaded with factual data and reviewers make mention of the contributions from the Wikipedia community and how diligently they work to add information to the site. Reviewers consider Wikipedia one of a handful of useful Reference Web Sites that can help complete a fact- finding mission. Because members add the actual reference content, there are some limitations to Wikipedia and the content cannot always be considered one- hundred percent accurate. But reviewers agree that Wikipedia makes a good starting point for official information on thousands of subjects.
26% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 5 stars
26% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 5 stars%
26%
34% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 4 stars
34% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 4 stars%
34%
17% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 3 stars
17% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 3 stars%
17%
17% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 2 stars
17% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 2 stars%
17%
6% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 1 star
6% of people rated Wikipedia.com  as 1 star%
6%
80% 80% of people recommend Wikipedia.com 20% of people don't recommend Wikipedia.com 20%
 

Wikipedia.com Comparison

4 star rating Most Helpful
Favorable Review
SEP
18
2009

I do like Wikipedia. I created a user account, and I did read the pages and pages of rules and regulations on what the content is/should be and how it is edited. I have not tried to add an entire new page of content. I have edited here and there, mostly for spelling and very minor things like that.


2009 VIP
married, a woman

pitcherday
Des Moines, IA
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
2 star rating Most Helpful
Critical Review
NOV
14
2007

Wikipedia is a free online Encyclopedia that has a lot of useful information.  Ever wonder how "hot" the hottest peppers are?  We did, and we found the results on wikipedia.  Yes wikipedia is a good starting point for simple facts, yet I cannot recommend you use this site as a researcher OR a content...

review »
2009 VIP
pretty quick with tech stuff, Every day computer user

vivasuzi
Livonia, MI
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 

Wikipedia.com Ratings and Reviews

items/page: 15 | 30 | 50 displaying 1 to 13 of 35 sort by: most helpful | date | rating


14
helpful
votes
expert web searcher, college lecturer, good eye for good data, will hit Wikipedia for leads

SEP
25
2007

All I could say was "Good grief!" when my son gave me a paper that started off, "According to Wikipedia . . ."

"Do you want to fail this class," I asked him.

"Well, no," he said.

I had to explain why Wikipedia is not considered a solid source in academic circles.

It's not that you can't find great information on Wikipedia. A lot of experts and fans do pop on and add to the knowledge base. I think that's great. So, I'm not knocking Wikipedia. It can be quite useful.

I often will click on Wikipedia as I begin to research a topic. Wikipedia often has good overviews as well as nice reference clicks. I...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
3 star rating
2009 VIP
CyndiA
southern, NC



5
helpful
votes
curious by nature, interested in cultural experiences, expert web searcher, good eye for good data

NOV
18
2007

I work in a college, and trying to show students that Wikipedia is NOT the answer to their research needs is very frustrating.  I feel it is a losing battle to get students to use real, peer reviewed resources that have been accepted in academic circles.  If you want to use Wikipedia for a fast and dirty look-up, that is fine. In fact I think that is the only way it should be used.  Most libraries have subscriptions to online databases, like the Encyclopedia Britannica, and EbscoHost and others that are the sources teachers want to see cited in the students research papers.

  Of course if you...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
2 star rating
reviewer
Reviewer
Wayne, PA



Reviews continue below ad
2
helpful
votes
Likes to be entertained, interested in cultural experiences, daily computer user, constantly online, community oriented, a busy person

SEP
27
2007

Wikipedia is great as a starting point for research or for quick answers.  In the same spirit as traditional encyclopedias, it isn't meant to be an in-depth authoritative reference on its topics, but sort of an overview.  If you're looking for really in-depth information on something specific or if your answer absolutely positively must be true without dispute, wikipedia should not be the only reference you check.  But if you're like me, most of what you look up on an average day isn't the kind of life or death situation where you need an iron-clad guarantee your answer is right or the kind...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
4 star rating
2009 Writer
redstarr
Fort Smith, AR



2
helpful
votes
curious by nature, expert web searcher

DEC
14
2007

Suggestions for using Wikipedia Intelligently

 

  • 1. Don't believe everything you read.
  • 2. Use the Ben Bradlee (Washington Post editor - Watergate era)...If you want me to print it get another source. Ironically, you can read what Bradlee thinks about Wikipedia at Wikipedia.
  • 3. Wikipedia is to research like a newspaper is to a library.
  • 4. Use the Sergeant Joe Friday approach (Dragnet) - Just the facts mam.
  • 5. Take small children to BIG libraries (college, university, The New York Public Library, The Library of Congress) before they can read. Experiencing a BIG library will install awe and perhaps confidence...
review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
5 star rating
2008 Contributor
stactom
Garrison, NY



2
helpful
votes
curious by nature, a researcher, daily computer user, Practical

MAR
28
2008
NO NO NO NO NO!

I  some what recently graduated from college and it was DRILLED into my head never to use this site.   It's your average everyday joe that can change the information.  Sorry I don't rely on your average every day person. 

The history pages are the worst.   It annoys me to see some of the things that people put in there.  For instance the civil war was all because of slaves?  Hardly.   Was very unhappy with this site! 


Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
1 star rating
2008 Contributor
tiffanymtaylor
Farmingdale, NY



1
helpful
vote
curious by nature, a travel junkie

JUN
1
2007

Limited Purpose Web Site
If you're trying to remember the name of Bon Jovi's biggest hit in 1991....or whatever happened to American Idol contestant Elliott Yamin.....or what year Hurricane Charlie hit.......FINE.  Go to Wikipedia.  Relieve yourself of the burden of not remembering little trivia that is driving you crazy.   Someone like yourself will have posted that information, and you can jog your memory. 

But don't get in the habit of going to Wikipedia as a serious reference web site.  Each listing is compiled and edited by a conglomeration of people whose qualifications are not known...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
3 star rating
2008 Advisor
LibbyMcMillan
Sanibel, FL



1
helpful
vote
curious by nature, interested in cultural experiences, daily computer user, a busy person

NOV
14
2007
I just have to say that Wikipedia knows ALL.  If you're ever blanking on something, or you're just curious about something, just go to wikipedia and type it in, and it will have so much information about what you're looking for!  They even made a joke about it on "The Office" - it really does know EVERYTHING!
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
5 star rating
reviewer
christine811
Orlando, FL



1
helpful
vote
curious by nature

NOV
13
2007
This site isn't great for telling the truth in a research paper, but it does have a ton of information on any topic you are interested in. It is easy to search and can help if you can't remember something. Good for basic information, but not for much else.
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
2 star rating
reviewer
heatha
Las Vegas, NV



D
curious by nature, daily computer user, a busy person

DEC
28
2007

How many times have you been having a conversation with a friend when all of a sudden you are trying to remember a specific date of something or who sang your favorite song?  Well Wikipedia is a great site for a quick glance of research and a good place to start on your topic.  You can find the answers to almost anything on the site, but I have to warn you that anyone can post to the site so the facts are not always true.  For those students writing a research paper it is really tough for them not to rely solely on the information provided on this site because it is accessed so easy.  I like...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
3 star rating
2008 VIP
stef42678
Las Vegas, NV



D
wikipedian, curious by nature, a busy person, daily computer user, constantly online, expert web searcher, an avid reader

NOV
24
2007

Wikipedia, the bane of college professors and the darling of the cut-n-paste club.  My personal favorite outlet for idle page surfing.

Personally, I like Oberlin College's approach.   Some of their professors integrated Wikipedia into some of the curriculum by having students take an article from Wikipedia and research it.   As they do that, the students develop discernment as they struggle to separate fact from fiction.     It doesn't take long before the students learn to question what they read or hear instead of blindly accepting everything as factual.  The faculty learned...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
4 star rating
reviewer
Caladonia6
El Paso, TX



D
curious by nature, technically challenged

SEP
3
2009

Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia:  I was only familiar with this site through vague, overheard academic references to it.  Then came the assignments to provide as much quality information on particular subjects as possible within a short period of time.  Long live the public libraries - they'll always be invaluable and I personally endorse any renewable source of paper - I like looking into books, holding the actual printed document in my hands, traveling to libraries and hunting through the shelves - you never know what you'll find while you're looking for something else... Wikipedia can't...

review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
5 star rating
reviewer
alexiadenisewatts
Brooklyn, NY



D
a researcher, daily computer user, a busy person, practical

NOV
13
2007
Wikipedia is taking over the country. If you have a research paper due on a subject, the first place to look and get the background information would be wikipedia. It gives a very good explanation and summary of a lot of things, a very good replacement for those books that people used to use, encyclopedias? A lot better than anything like Encarta, because it is constantly updated and always with the latest information. The best part is it will have links, or the references for articles or other books where it got the information from. So when the teacher wants to know where you got your information... review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
4 star rating
reviewer
soker9chik
Madison, WI



D
interested in cultural experiences, a busy person, good eye for good data, expert web searcher, a travel writer

NOV
21
2007
I travel and I admit, I love being a tourist.  I am not one to research an area and find my own guides to take me to places that I have identified.  Rather, I love a tour.  I want all arrangements made and all sites identified.  I just want to go and enjoy the experience.  However, I see so many things and take so many pictures.  When I return home I make a book of my trip.  To find more details on what I have seen, or even to identify a picture I have taken, I turn to Wikipedia.  Using the itenary of the trip and information given by the guides, I can find information that allows me... review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
4 star rating
reviewer
smokey
Columbus, GA



Reviews of Wikipedia.com

1  2  3  
Buttons_next
 

Start a New Discussion about Wikipedia.com