Autos Baby Beauty Books Computers Education Electronics Health Home & Garden Local Places Movies Pets Travel Web Sites more…

Wikipedia.com

Wikipedia.com Review


www.wikipedia.com



Overall 3.47 of 5 view all 32 reviews




Good idea in theory - bad result
2 star rating

curious by nature, interested in cultural experiences, expert web searcher, good eye for good data
Pros

    Quick answers to trivia

Cons
    not an authoritative source

NOV
18
2007

I work in a college, and trying to show students that Wikipedia is NOT the answer to their research needs is very frustrating.  I feel it is a losing battle to get students to use real, peer reviewed resources that have been accepted in academic circles.  If you want to use Wikipedia for a fast and dirty look-up, that is fine. In fact I think that is the only way it should be used.  Most libraries have subscriptions to online databases, like the Encyclopedia Britannica, and EbscoHost and others that are the sources teachers want to see cited in the students research papers.

  Of course if you are not writing a paper for school, I think Wikipedia is a fine place to get a quick fact or an overview of a recent event, like Hurricane Katrina - but just remember to double check the information, since anyone can post.

 

  If I had a nickel every time a teacher complained about Wikipedia, I would be rich!

Last edited on Nov 18, 2007


I_thumb_down Wikipedia.com is not recommended by Reviewer


3
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
Review inappropriate? Copyright violation?




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about Reviewer’s Review



stactom wrote on Dec 14, 2007 at 9:25AM


Good points about libraries and databases.