2008 Advisor
cmohr80
Running Springs, CA

I should have walked out of the theater and got my $ back!

1 star rating

a movie buff, watching with kids, I believe in honesty, noticing the details
Pros

    Monsters look good, AWESOME music

Cons
    doesn't evoke any emotion, poor script, obnoxious character, nothing like the book, boring, No clear message, Slow

OCT
21
2009

   Reading the picture book Where the Wild Things Areis a fond childhood memory. When I heard they were making a movie based on this children's classic, I was anxious with anticipation for it's creation.  When I heard that Spike Jonze (director of Being John Malkovich) would be the director, I was even more excited. The commercials made it look excellent. Before the opening day, I was already hearing great things about it. Some friends who had seen it opening weekend used the words "moving," "heart-warming," "emotional," and "meaningful" to describe the family film. So, I must say, that I had great expectations for this movie.

   Where the Wild Things Are, a film based on the classic children's picture book by Maurice Sendak and directed by Spike Jonze, stars a character named Max, played by Max Records, who is over active and has a wild imagination, but lacks in courage and angers easily. After acting out and lashing out at his mother, played by Catherine Keener, Max runs off and sails to an island where these strange creatures live and gets into mischief and wild fun. Voices of some of the "Wild Things" are James Gandolfini, Forest Whitaker and Catherine O'Hara.

   I was so excited as I walked into the movie theater with my child to see this film. Where The Wild Things Are started so slow . . . slow . . . slow. . . waiting . . . waiting . . . waiting . . . Then, the boy was obnoxious. My husband kept on wanting to lean over to my son and let him know that the boy was displaying unacceptable behavior. There should be a disclaimer for the parents explaining the bratty-ness of that boy. The fact Max got away with the poor behavior without consequences was despicable! The way Spike Jonze and Dave Eggers wrote out the script to make it two hours was poor, poor, so poor.

   I was waiting for the movie to give me an emotional connection and nothing! No laugh, no tear, nothing that "moved" me "to" my "core," as many were saying. In fact, it was so disappointing, that my husband kept shifting in his seat. The more and more I watched, the more and more disappointed I got that the screenplay absolutely butchered this classic children's novel! The meaning the book beautifully brings across to children was practically non-existent in the movie.

   I was speechless walking out of that movie. We would have walked out 20 minutes into the movie, if it weren't for my son wanting to see it to the end. My husband and I even found ourselves explaining to our son that Max displayed poor behavior and that we expect him to behave way better at all times than that Max does.

   Were the creation of the "Wild Things" neat? Being built by the geniuses at Jim Henson studio, so absolutely! The character effects were interesting, cute, fun and impressive, but that doesn't make up for the terrible script. I get so disappointed when an FX or action movie is lacking in script writing effort. I feel it absolutely wastes the cost of the movie production when there's no decent script to work with.

   We happened to have free tickets we wanted to use and thank goodness for that because I would have gone to the ticket window and requested my money back. Where The Wild Things Are is such a poor movie that it was a waste of two hours to watch and a waste of money to produce.

   Boo! . . . And I was soooo looking forward to it's theater release!

Last edited on Nov 09, 2009



I_thumb_down Where the Wild Things Are is not recommended by cmohr80

1
helpful
vote
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about cmohr80’s Review

 


cmohr80 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 at 10:55PM

In response to Carmela55555's comment from Nov 7, 2009 at 10:17PM:

It's great that you enjoyed it though. I wish I could have enjoyed it as much as you did! ;o)

cmohr80 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 at 9:55PM

In response to Carmela55555's comment from Nov 7, 2009 at 10:11PM:

I wasn't blaming the movie for out of control kids. I was simply stating that it can encourage bad behavior in children who are impressionable. My child understands that movies and shows are for entertainment purposes, but not many children are taught that. I agree, yes the boy does behave badly in the book, but it didn't loose the message of overcoming anger, like the film did. Some might have found the end touching, but it stirred no emotion in those I watched it with at all. Bottom line, the movie was poorly written. It being a children's picture book is no excuse because The Grinch and Polar Express were draw out into 2 hours very well. Which was unfortunate, because it was awesome that they brought on Jim Henson's Studio to create the monsters and they were awesome. But in my opinion, it devalues amazing special effects when there is not a decent script to work with.

Carmela55555 wrote on Nov 7, 2009 at 10:17PM

Also the sad & touching part was when Max was leaving the Island. A hint was the tears in the Monsters eyes & Max.

Carmela55555 wrote on Nov 7, 2009 at 10:11PM

In my opinion, everyone seems so surprised as to how the boy behaved & how dark the movie was. Some people need to get a back bone. In the book Max behaves badly. I remember being young and also thinking that the book was alittle creepy. Why does everyone seem surprised by what goes on in the movie? It's no different from the book. If your child misbehaves then it is the parents fault. I went with my 3 1/2 year old, 6 year old & husband. My husband fell asleep but the kids and I loved it. Al kids are different, but it's up to the parents to do their jobs as parents and to stop blaming a movie for out of control kids.

cmohr80 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 at 5:08PM

In response to GigiandAdonai's comment from Oct 22, 2009 at 9:22AM:

That's the thing for me; many of my friends who had already seen it told me that it was so good and that they were emotional. So I was even more excited. What a let down!

cmohr80 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 at 5:07PM

In response to GreatMartin's comment from Oct 22, 2009 at 9:18AM:

I was actually kind of ticked because I was looking forward to this movie, so much, for months and the commercial is so desceptive!

GigiandAdonai wrote on Oct 22, 2009 at 9:22AM

I thought I wanted to see this movie too but so far I haven't heard or read a positive review.

GreatMartin wrote on Oct 22, 2009 at 9:18AM

I almost agree with you about the movie--will be posting my review this afternoon.

GreatMartin wrote on Oct 22, 2009 at 9:18AM

I almost agree with you about the movie--will be posting my review this afternoon.