2009 VIP
Fardreamer
Miami, FL
Shawshank Redemption is an uplifting and enduring classic!
5 star rating

a movie buff, read for fun, a writer, Stephen King fan, a fiction reader, movie lover, Journalism major, history minor, avid reader
show all »
Pros

    Fine script, Great cast, not a typical King story

Cons
    Might be too slow paced, Prison setting might disturb some

OCT
7
2008

The Shawshank Redemption (Two-Disc Special Edition) — 

Remember, Red, hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies. - Andy Dufresne

As incredible as it seems, nearly 15 years have passed since writer-director Frank Darabont's The Shawshank Redemption first premiered in theaters - and tanked badly at the box office.  (According to the Internet Movie Database, it opened in 33 theaters on Sept. 23, 1994 and only made $737,000.00 in its opening weekend, a disastrous "take" for a film which cost $25,000,000 to make.)

Even so, in 2008, Darabont's adaptation of Stephen King's novella Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption is now considered a beloved classic that stands beside such films as Casablanca, Citizen Kane, and Star Wars as one of the best movies of all time.

At first glance, this set-in-a-prison movie doesn't seem like the most appealing of things to watch for entertainment.  It takes place mostly in one place (Shawshank State Prison in Maine).  It's very dependent on dialogue. It doesn't feature fancy camera work.  It's a Stephen King film without the expected "Stephen King" shtick of horror and the supernatural.

And in the beginning, despite good reviews - Roger Ebert said it  "is deeper than most films; about continuity in a lifetime, based on friendship and hope" - The Shawshank Redemption failed to catch on with moviegoers and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science, winning none of the seven Academy Awards it was nominated for in 1995.

Yet, just as what happened with Rob Reiner's The Princess Bride, Darabont's awe-inspring directorial debut became a classic after its release on home video and many airings on the Ted Turner-owned TNT cable network.

I believe in two things: discipline and the Bible. Here you'll receive both. Put your trust in the Lord; your ass belongs to me. Welcome to Shawshank. - Warden Norton

Starring Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton, William Sadler, Jeffrey DeMunn, and James Whitmore (among others), The Shawshank Redemption takes place over a 21-year span of time, starting in 1946 when a banker named Andy Dufresne (Robbins) is arrested, tried and convicted for the murder of his wife and her golf-pro lover. 

Of course, since Darabont and King were both inspired by some of the "innocent man in prison" films made in the 1930s and '40s, we all know that Andy isn't guilty, but his "cold fish" demeanor and some circumstantial "evidence" helps convince a jury that he is, so he is sentenced to serve two consecutive life sentences in Shawshank State Prison.

When the film's narrator Ellis Boyd "Red" Redding (Freeman) first sees Andy arrive, he dismisses the tall-but-quiet ex-banker as a guy who won't last long.  Indeed, he wagers some of his cigarettes - a precious commodity in a 1940s-era prison - that Andy won't even make it through his first night at Shawshank. 

Red loses the bet, but as he gets to know Andy, he begins to respect the quiet yet resilient guy who keeps to himself, bravely resists a gang of prisoners known as the sisters, and asks him to acquire seemingly harmless things to help make his prison time a bit bearable - a Rita Hayworth poster and a rock hammer here, a bunch of sculptable rocks there.  Eventually, the two become friends and help each other survive the long interminable stretches of incarceration.

This being a Stephen King tale, there is a monster in The Shawshank Redemption, but it is not a "typical" mythical creature like the vampire from 'Salem's Lot or the haunted car from Christine.  In the guise of the outwardly devout but inwardly corrupt Warden Samuel Norton (Gunton), the dark nature of humanity is revealed when he uses his authority to keep Andy in prison because the former banker knows too much about Norton's various "private enterprises" - kickbacks and other illegal dealings that the state government knows nothing about.

There's a whole lot more of plot and many characters whose lives are affected by Andy's stay in Shawshank, but if you haven't seen the film yet (hardly likely, but it's possible), I'll leave it for you to discover on your own.

My Viewpoint: Although I had seen bits and pieces of The Shawshank Redemption on TNT and knew the story well from when I read it in King's Different Seasons, only recently did I see the whole film after I used a $25 gift certificate from Amazon to buy it and a couple of other bargain-priced DVDs. I'd liked what I had read back in the early 1980s and was intrigued by the sequences I'd seen on cable, but I was left breathless by the sheer power of Darabont's remarkably faithful adaptation of King's novella.

What makes this movie work when by all rights it shouldn't? Well, to begin with, the screenplay is remarkably good, keeping most of the flavor of King's writing and storytelling techniques intact while jiggering with some of the details to make Shawshank more cinematic.  As all adapters do, Darabont adds a few touches and plot points of his own. yet stays essentially true to King's themes and characterizations.

Then, of course, there's the acting.  As the narrator and one of the two leads, Morgan Freeman gives viewers a bravura performance that erases all traces of his character's literary origins as a white, red-haired Irish con/scrounger. 

Co-starring as the always-quiet, sometimes mysterious Andy Dufresne, Tim Robbins also acquits himself in a very impressive manner.  I like the way that Robbins shows that the guy is always observing things and never gives in to despair even in the least hopefull of places.

The rest of the cast includes Gil Bellows, James Whitmore, William Sadler (who, along with Jeffrey DeMunn, appears in Stephen King's The Mist and The Green Mile), Clancy Brown, Mark Rolston, and Jude Cicolella (of 24 fame).  Some of these appear only briefly, but others have significant roles. Regardless, they all fit seamlessly into their respective roles and pull you into this story of friendship, survival, and, yes, redemption.

 

Last edited on Oct 08, 2008



I_thumb_up The Shawshank Redemption (Two-Disc Special Edition) is recommended by Fardreamer

10
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about Fardreamer’s Review

 


LisaCarey wrote on Oct 13, 2008 at 12:14PM

This is one of my all time favorite movies. I am usually a watch 'em and leave them kind of girl, but there is so much to this that I can watch it over and over again. Great review on a really complicated movie, and noticing the "little" things about it that make it special.

PattyTherre wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 4:45PM

In response to Fardreamer's comment from Oct 9, 2008 at 2:03PM:

I've been here but phantom rating on the fly!

GeorgeChabot wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 4:01PM

In response to Fardreamer's comment from Oct 9, 2008 at 2:05PM:

Sure, it's just a difference in taste. I think Shawshank is quite a bit too long and has a couple of weak conclusions rather than a single strong one. But it is probably one of the better movies made out of anything written by Steve King. :>

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 2:05PM

In response to GeorgeChabot's comment from Oct 9, 2008 at 7:37AM:

Thanks, George, You're a fantastic reviewer, even though we may disagree from time to time on the merits of some movies.

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 2:03PM

In response to PattyTherre's comment from Oct 9, 2008 at 1:05AM:

Thanks, Patti. Glad to see you here again.

GeorgeChabot wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 7:37AM

I think it thinks a little higher of itself than I do, but you did a good tribute, bud. ;>

PattyTherre wrote on Oct 9, 2008 at 1:05AM

Awesome review. I liked this movie a lot.

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 8, 2008 at 2:20PM

In response to MikeMaroon's comment from Oct 8, 2008 at 2:32AM:

I agree! And thanks for the kind comment!

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 8, 2008 at 2:19PM

In response to AnnaBanana's comment from Oct 7, 2008 at 7:34PM:

Thanks, Anna. Funny...this is the kind of movie I'm not usually passionate about, but Darabont's take on the novella is...simply awesome.

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 8, 2008 at 2:16PM

In response to JovialCougar's comment from Oct 7, 2008 at 5:55PM:

Fair enough. No guarantees, but I'm sure you'll like it if you do watch it! :-)

Fardreamer wrote on Oct 8, 2008 at 2:14PM

In response to SpokaneMan's comment from Oct 7, 2008 at 5:12PM:

It certainly deserves to be on a Top 10 list of "best movies," that's for sure! Thanks for the read!

MikeMaroon wrote on Oct 8, 2008 at 2:32AM

This is one of the best movies ever made. Great review!

AnnaBanana wrote on Oct 7, 2008 at 7:34PM

Great review about a great movie! The miracle of this film is that the two main protagonists didn't look a bit like the guys in the novella, but it still worked.

JovialCougar wrote on Oct 7, 2008 at 5:55PM

I've never seen this movie since I've always waited until I was ''in the mood'' to see it. Perhaps you have convinced me to finally watch it, but no guarantees.

SpokaneMan wrote on Oct 7, 2008 at 5:12PM

Great movie. I have it on my list of the 10 best actually. :)