The Mist

The Mist Review



Overall 3.56 of 5 view all 25 reviews
 




TracyAlana
Honolulu, HI

The Mist exposes underbelly of science vs. religion debate

4 star rating

a fan of clever plots, into movies that tell a great story, movie buff
Pros

    visceral horror, thought-provoking

Cons
    weak CGI

NOV
27
2007

I'm on the fence with this one. One moment, I want to bash the film for its poor computer graphic imagery and weak sci-fi effects. On the other hand, I want to herald it as the most thought-inducing horror film I've seen this year. Last year, I watched The Descent and enjoyed it for its visceral horror. This year, I regard The Mist as doing the same job.

Stephen King's novella, of which this film is based on, puts you in the eye of the storm and makes you face your worst fear of all- the unpredictable, primitive human. The film unravels like this: A storm leaves a town in disarray and a mysterious fog in the distance creeps slowly, but not yet threatening, towards the community. The lead character drives his son and his not-so-friendly neighbor to the grocery store to pick up supplies. After a few casual conversations with the townspeople, a man comes running to the store with a bloody nose panicking, screaming that there is something in the mist. With no power or electricity, the phones and rescue are inaccessible so a few dozen of these folks are trapped in the supermarket with no idea what's waiting for them outside. Some panic and run for their cars, and after a brief moment of suspense, you hear blood-curdling screams. What god-awful thing is lurking in the mist? Is it chemical? Is it supernatural?

Without giving away the movie to all you buffs out there, this film exposes the soft underbelly of the science vs. religion fiasco. I did not expect this at all, but being a Biology major, I found it struck a chord much louder than I had ever anticipated. The rest of the film is for you to unwrap. I have not read the novel, nor have I even heard of the synopsis prior to watching the film. The director Frank Darabont did an excellent job retelling this Stephen King classic and even twisted the ending to make some walk out of the theater completely floored. You as the viewer will feel an uncontrollable urge to choke some of the characters such as Mrs. Carmody, who inflicts the most harm in the most unpredictable way. Some scenes stretched my patience, where I felt I was in the middle of the frenzy and needed to help the characters. The entire theater was in uproar during the film screaming at the cast of what to do.

The biggest accomplishment that I commend Darabont for doing is changing the ending where you don't get that "All is good in the world" feeling. It rattles you. It makes you replay the last fifteen minutes in your head over and over to see what else they could have done. If that's not your cup of chai, I would not recommend seeing The Mist. Otherwise, I give this film 4 big ones for its non-conventional approach and thought-provoking ending.

Last edited on Nov 27, 2007



I_thumb_up The Mist is recommended by TracyAlana

10
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about TracyAlana’s Review

 


AmyA wrote on Jan 2, 2008 at 4:47AM

Great review Tracy...I keep going back and forth on if I am going to see this one...you review helps. Thank you

JennyTemple wrote on Dec 13, 2007 at 9:31AM

Sounds great!

Kristy wrote on Dec 2, 2007 at 9:41PM

Sounds interesting - great review!

GeorgeChabot wrote on Nov 29, 2007 at 4:20AM

Nice analysis. Thanks for a good read! :>

TracyAlana wrote on Nov 28, 2007 at 11:17PM

In response to Fardreamer's comment from Nov 28, 2007 at 10:35PM:

Fardreamer- Wow, you did screenplay writing? My hats off to you--that's impressive. Thx for the comment and insight. :)

TracyAlana wrote on Nov 28, 2007 at 11:16PM

In response to aprilefisher's comment from Nov 28, 2007 at 1:01PM:

That's great, April! Just go in like me not expecting anything and I think you'll be pleased. :)

Fardreamer wrote on Nov 28, 2007 at 10:35PM

Funny...I happen to be reading "Skeleton Crew" - the anthology in which The Mist is perhaps easiest to be found, and while I haven't seen the film, I know it will be a good one, considering that Frank Darabont also directed The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile.

As for the ending being changed, I don't think I'll have much of a problem with that. I've done a bit of screenplay writing (not professionally) and in studying that particular style of writing, I've learned that adaptations of novels, novellas, and short stories seldom are 100% "faithful" to the letter of the original source.

aprilefisher wrote on Nov 28, 2007 at 1:01PM

I love Stephen King based movies--always so unique and thought-provoking. This sounds awesome too, but I will save it for a day when I have time to think about the shocking ending (I'm so curious about what it could be...) Thanks for the review!

TracyAlana wrote on Nov 27, 2007 at 10:55AM

In response to hrairoorah's comment from Nov 27, 2007 at 8:39AM:

I agree with you in that the ending in the book was not "all is good in the world" either, but it left the characters with hope. This ending did not. I commend film directors for choosing to go against the masses and create a controversial, conversation-inducing ending, regardless of whether or not the viewers give it their blessings. Stephen King himself applauded Darabont's adaptation, and couldn't be happier with his new ending. In a press conference, King said,

“Frank wrote a new ending that I loved. It is the most shocking ending ever and there should be a law passed stating that anybody who reveals the last 5 minutes of this film should be hung from their neck until dead.”

The new ending to the movie made me feel sick, but for me to get that type of response from a film shows that the movie did hit me on a visceral level. I appreciate your comment, and hope you find a movie that gives you that same feeling. :)

hrairoorah wrote on Nov 27, 2007 at 8:39AM

I have to disagree with your review of The Mist. This has been one of my all time favorite stories from Stephen King. I think the worst thing Darabont did with this film was to change the ending. The short story ending was, in my opinion, far better. This film has the typical twist ending made popular with The Twilight Zone TV show. I am a fan of such endings, however I think it actually took away from the film.
The short story ending was not an "All is good in the world" feeling, far from it. If you have the time, I suggest reading the short story and comparing the two endings. I would be interested in knowing which you prefer.