The Godfather's Revenge

The Godfather's Revenge Review


by Mark Winegardner



Overall 3.25 of 5 view all 4 reviews
 




2008 Reviewer
Magician
Columbia, MO

One man's choices and the consequences for all around him

3 star rating

chronic book buyer, avid reader
Pros

    Well-known characters, Continuing series, Well written

Cons
    Sprawling and unfocused, Needed summary of previuos book

FEB
3
2008
Mario Puzo created an American mythology for the Sicilian Mafia with the publication of his acclaimed novel, The Godfather, in 1969.  The novel was adapted into two Academy Award winning movies, The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather, Part 2 (1974).  Puzo wrote three sequels to his novel:  The Sicilian (1984), The Last Don (1996) and Omerta (2000-published after Puzo's death in 1999).  Since Puzo's death, Mark Winegardner has taken up the Godfather Saga with the permission of the Puzo Estate.  Winegardner's latest continuation of the story, The Godfather's Revenge, is his second venture into the world of the Corleone's following The Godfather Returns in 2004.

The Godfather's Revenge continues the story from where Winegardner left it in The Godfather's Return.  And that's okay, but with the two-year break between novels, many of the storylines will likely have been forgotten by the reader.  Winegardner makes very little attempt to fill the reader in on what actually happened in the previous novel, suffice to say one guesses there was some bad stuff that happened.  This novel takes place in the years 1963 and 1964.  And just like reality, there is a young charismatic president who was elected through the Mob's help.  His brother is the Attorney General and is actively trying to take the Mob down.  This is causing problems as Michael supported the president, persuading the rest of the family heads to go along.  They, of course, are not happy with the turn of events.  Added to this, there is concern about the deteriorating health of Michael Corleone.  He is ill with diabetes and suffers from its effects.  His former top capo, Nick Geraci, having survived a planned plane crash to eliminate him and set him up as the scapegoat for the violence in the previous novel, is in hiding and plotting the Corleone family's downfall.  Events swirl among the Corleone family, a venture into Hollywood, presidential politics, and other families vying for power.  Events in the political sphere track closely with our own past with differences for literary necessity.  The novel moves to a satisfying conclusion that is not wholly unexpected.

I found the book to be extremely readable.  However, it doesn't burst with action.  There are moments, but the novel seems to move at a glacial pace.  I kept waiting for something important to happen.  I think it could have been tightened up with some judicious editing.  It often drifted into storylines about minor characters.  The focus should have been more on Michael Corleone and Nick Geraci.  These are the two people we are most interested in.  Also, a quick summary of what happened in the previous novel would have been extremely helpful.  I had read the previous book, but I didn't remember what had happened and was force to draw clues as I went along.  I will give a guarded recommendation with the caveats as stated.  Certainly, fans of The Sopranos will enjoy this although it takes place in an earlier time period.



I_thumb_up The Godfather's Revenge is recommended by Magician

5
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about Magician’s Review

 


gaelforce wrote on Sep 19, 2009 at 8:25AM

Your review of the book is totally accurate. There was so much time between the first book and the second then the third that I had to go back and read the previous ones before I could read the next one.

Just as in The Godfather when they laid it on heavily that Johnny Fontaine was really Frank Sinatra, they laid it on too thick that the President & his brother were Jack & Bobby Kennedy. People who read these books are pretty smart. We don't have to be hit over the head with stuff,

I'm not sure they had to kill off Tom Hagen. He was my favorite - after Vito - and was the bunch. But that's just s personal opinion.

But for anyone who is thinking of buying the book, your review was perfect. It would have been much better with tighter editing. There are way too many characters, some of them just seemed to be drifting around doing nothing. It was hard to keep the names straight and figure where they fit in.

It did hit the usual themes of revenge, the omerta and doomed love perfectly.

So all in all, your review was absolututely fair and gave people enough information to make an informed choice.

prk wrote on Aug 6, 2008 at 2:47AM

judious review and that too of an important and acclaimed book called GODFATHER. but i thk tht a writer is a little inclined towrds making godfather a not so thrilling story. the neatness in which he wrte the novel has to be acclaimed and tht too at a time when literary wrks havent reachd tht height.

prakash behnan t, kerala, india

williampinn wrote on Feb 8, 2008 at 3:30PM

Yep, I concur. I thought the prologue was great, but after that...zzzzzzzzzz...zzzzzzzzz...yawn.....

kid-kansas wrote on Feb 3, 2008 at 3:50PM

Thanks for sharing. Ron