The Catcher In the Rye

The Catcher In the Rye Review


by J.D. Salinger



Overall 3.50 of 5 view all 6 reviews
 




 Staff
Buggheart
Detroit Rock City, MI
Well there go 8 hours of my life I'll never get back.
2 star rating

a fan of clever plots, an avid reader, a fan of quick, page turning books
Pros

    starts off good, some funny moments I could relate to

Cons
    boring, story goes nowhere

JAN
31
2008

The Catcher In the Rye — 

The Verdict:  After reading The Catcher in the Rye I have decided to give up on reading the classics. Yawn city.

Just the Facts:  I'm not honestly sure what prompted me to read The Catcher in the Rye.  I think it was all the people who raved about it.  Perhaps the feeling that I should read it simply because it is a classic.  Not sure.  But what I am sure about is that I really disliked this book.

The Catcher in the Rye is the story of Holden Caulfield; a well-off teenager who has flunked out of yet another private school.  The book is basically a diary of the two days he spends after leaving school and going home to his family and the situations in which he becomes involved.

The book, at first, was good.  But I kept waiting for something really bad or really interesting to happen. Something that would make me stand up and say "Aha!  I understand why this is such a beloved story!"  Unfortunately that never happened and all I got was the continuing, rambling, boring story of Holden the loser who cannot keep his brain focused on one thought for longer than 2 seconds. 

Closing Argument: For its time this book was very controversial due to the swearing, underage drinking, and general teenage rebellion.  I guess it was the 1940s equivalent of Go Ask Alice.  All I know is that this 2000s reader was bored, bored, bored.  2 stars. 

 

Last edited on Jan 31, 2008



I_thumb_down The Catcher In the Rye is not recommended by Buggheart

6
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about Buggheart’s Review

 


circlefacebb wrote on Mar 23, 2008 at 12:27PM

Ugh - Thank you...I couldn't agree more, but it seems everyone thinks we are supposed to love it because it's a "classic" - sorry, I'm going to make my own decisions - and I'm with you on this one - never could get into this book...

mrkstvns wrote on Feb 5, 2008 at 9:14AM

Awww, NOOO! Don't give up on the classics for just one book. Try Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men" and Albert Camus's "The Stranger" --- they're both great books that are easy and fast to read.

vivasuzi wrote on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:57PM

In response to AutumnDM's comment from Feb 1, 2008 at 7:30AM:

Oh, I liked Lord of the Flies in grade school :) Maybe b/c I imagined a world ran by kids!!

vivasuzi wrote on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:57PM

I have never read, and know many people who did in school. I'm sure glad I didn't have to now that I hear your verdict!! Sounds like a bore.

AutumnDM wrote on Feb 1, 2008 at 7:30AM

I remember reading this book in school many years ago. It was around the time that "Lord of the Flies" was popular. I don't remember much about "The Catcher In the Rye," however.

joyjoy wrote on Jan 31, 2008 at 1:32PM

I loved Catcher in the Rye. Everyone to his/her own taste.

CrystaBush wrote on Jan 31, 2008 at 10:33AM

LOL....that's why no one in book club read it!!!

kid-kansas wrote on Jan 31, 2008 at 10:08AM

We had to read this in High School and write a paper on it, I didn't like it either! Ron