reviewer 2009 Contributor
lizardsally
Winter Springs, FL

TRESemme Anti-Breakage conditioner ROCKS!!

5 star rating

au 'naturale'
Pros

    cruelty free, reduces breakage, leaves hair soft and manageable


APR
29
2009

TRESemme Anti-breakage Shampoo — 

TRESemme Anti-Breakage conditioner is AWESOME!  I'm the kind of girl who doesn't wear much makeup and I don't use any "hair styling" products or color my hair - I just wanted a decent conditioner!  I'd been using Pantene Pro-V for years because it worked, but I'm really trying to avoid products made by Procter and Gamble since they're known to test their products on animals.  I've tried many other conditioners in the past but I still kept coming back to Pantene (unfortunately) because none of them worked that well. 

I finally found this one and it's NOT tested on animals but still makes my long, fine (naturally) blonde hair nice and soft!  Since my hair is so fine it breaks easily but this conditioner really does seem to reduce that breakage.  The fact that it's cruelty-free is such an awesome bonus!  I haven't been using TRESemme shampoo or the leave in conditioner like they recommend on the bottle (I just use a cheap shampoo) but it still seems to work great, leaving my hair nice and soft and not easily tangled.

If you have long hair and are loooking for a product that's cruelty free but still works then I highly recommend this conditioner!

 

Last edited on May 23, 2009



I_thumb_up TRESemme Anti-breakage Shampoo is recommended by lizardsally

D
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 



add lizardsally to my friends list add to my favorites email to a friend subscribe to feed

I_comment_shdw24 Comments about lizardsally’s Review

 


lizardsally wrote on Nov 5, 2009 at 1:56PM

In response to Faint52lp's comment from Nov 4, 2009 at 2:13PM:

You're right, I apologize.

Faint52lp wrote on Nov 4, 2009 at 2:13PM

Lizardsally, you should not be attacking LisaAnnLisa for attempting to give you some more information in case you wanted it. I was so excited when I looked on the back of the bottle in Tresemme to see it said "no animal testing," but I didn't read the ingredients. Now that I know there's gelatin it it I will not be using it. Just because you think supporting the meat industry in any way is not cruel does not mean other people agree with you. I understand you have your opinion, but don't start attacking someone when they clearly said a couple of times that they were only trying to help you out and not start a fight. Take a chill pill.

Cruelty free (in my and most vegetarian's opinions) means no animals were tested on and/or no parts of them were used in the making of the product.

lizardsally wrote on Nov 1, 2009 at 2:14PM

In response to LisaAnnLisa's comment from Nov 1, 2009 at 1:50PM:

NO ANIMALS WERE KILLED OR HARMED TO MAKE THIS PRODUCT! Why would you even bother to read a review on a product you obviously have issues with? Just so you can make comments on it? Animals are being killed whether you like it or not. What is so wrong with making sure none of that animal is wasted? If you don't like this shampoo, then you can choose not to use it. I love it, and I love the fact that it is not TESTED on animals as other products are. Animal testing is extremely cruel.

LisaAnnLisa wrote on Nov 1, 2009 at 1:50PM

In response to lizardsally's comment from Nov 1, 2009 at 1:03PM:

Again, except the animals that were killed.

And, again, I apologize for upsetting you so. Just trying to be helpful make sure everyone has all the information and is not confused. Thanks for the spirited discussion, but that was not my intention. It seems you know there is an animal derived ingredients in this product so there is no need to keep posting.

lizardsally wrote on Nov 1, 2009 at 1:03PM

In response to LisaAnnLisa's comment from Nov 1, 2009 at 9:06AM:

Feeding your dogs a vegetarian diet is your choice - but wild dogs always choose to eat meat if it is available. Anyway this product *is* cruelty-free. No animals were harmed in the making or testing of it.

LisaAnnLisa wrote on Nov 1, 2009 at 9:06AM

In response to lizardsally's comment from Nov 1, 2009 at 7:54AM:

Well, my very healthy and happy vegetarian dogs would disagree with you. But, again, just trying to help out anyone who wanted a cruelty free product and didn't know that this has ingredients derived from animals. I apologize that I have offended you by just offering information to you and others who read this.

lizardsally wrote on Nov 1, 2009 at 7:54AM

In response to LisaAnnLisa's comment from Oct 31, 2009 at 5:26PM:

Even if people didn't eat meat - carnivores such as domestic dogs and cats would still need it, so yes, it is always going to be necessary to kill animals for their meat. You're not going to make animals change their mind about needing to eat meat even if somehow humans could be convinced.

LisaAnnLisa wrote on Oct 31, 2009 at 5:26PM

In response to lizardsally's comment from Oct 31, 2009 at 4:52PM:

Sorry, I'm not going to get into a war over semantics or necessity of meat with you. As I said, I was just trying to help in case you didn't want bits of animals in your shampoo. I apologize profusely for trying to clarify something for you and others.

lizardsally wrote on Oct 31, 2009 at 4:52PM

In response to LisaAnnLisa's comment from Oct 31, 2009 at 4:25PM:

Animals are always going to be killed for meat. Using the gelatin that comes from meat does not make the product a cruel product. Would you prefer that by-products go into the landfill instead of being used in another way?

LisaAnnLisa wrote on Oct 31, 2009 at 4:25PM

In response to lizardsally's comment from Oct 31, 2009 at 7:52AM:

Wow. Sorry. Just trying to help out, since sometimes companies do not make it clear and it can be hard to find products that do not use or test on animals.

However, I will have to disagree with you that products that contain parts of animals that have been slaughtered are cruelty free.

lizardsally wrote on Oct 31, 2009 at 7:52AM

In response to LisaAnnLisa's comment from Oct 30, 2009 at 10:43PM:

I never said this was a vegan product. Gelatin comes from cows that have already been killed for eating, it's a by-product of the meat industry. No animals are harmed *just* to make this product, which was my point. Therefore, it is cruelty-free.

LisaAnnLisa wrote on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:43PM

It may not be tested on animals, but it contains an animal product- gelatin. Therefore, it is not cruelty-free since animals are killed to make TRESemme Anti-breakage Shampoo

5 star rating
"Tresemme Anti-breakage shampoo is AWESOME, well worth the money!"
More TRESemme Anti-breakage Shampoo reviews
4 star rating
"You get immediate results with TRESemme Anti-Breakage Shampoo."



More reviews by lizardsally
add lizardsally to my friends list

5 star ratingNikon - D80 Digital Camera Review - "The Nikon D80 is a great camera for...
5 star ratingCanon PIXMA MP620 All-In-One InkJet Printer Review - "This printer ROCKS!!!"
5 star ratingComfortis Review - "I hate using chemicals on my dogs, but this stuff...
reviews by lizardsally »
view more in Shampoo view more in Hair Care