Star Trek

Star Trek Review



Overall 4.33 of 5 view all 15 reviews
 




2009 Contributor
madburns57
Claremont, NH

Action packed and dazzeling

5 star rating

a movie buff, a movie lover, waiting for the DVD, into action flicks
Pros

    EXCITING!, Wonderful special effects, any Trek is better than no Trek, Lots of action, Beloved characters, Good humor, good story line, Great casting, Entertaining even for non-Trekkies

Cons
    NONE!!!, Not ONE

JUN
11
2009

Star Trek — 

Star Trek (2009) Remake or reinvention... Most people think when you go back to write something as a prequel or so it will be a flop or worse than the original. Star Trek was just the opposite. It open doors to new fans and re-energized it so to say. With the all new cast (aside from Nimoy) created something "sexy" in a sense about Star Trek. The only flaw in the cast I suppose that anyone could have argued with was the selection of Simon Pegg (Shawn of the Dead, Hot Fuzz). I think anyone who heard that who loves Star Trek was sure that was a flopped selection... but soon proven wrong by his performance. The story was well written, usually when you have anything to do with the future and time travel it seems so far out and childishly stupid... this played very well with the theme of the movie staying fast paced, emotional, and full of vegence. I believe that starting out with Captain Chrisopher Pike was a great way of staying true to the begining of Star Trek the Original Series but going with the Romulan Villain Nero really left it open for the to freely maneuver and create the own bit of story. Over all it was an amazing action packed flick for Old Star Trek Fand and creating New.



I_thumb_up Star Trek is recommended by madburns57

2
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about madburns57’s Review