2008 VIP
GeorgeChabot
Conyers, GA

The shame of the nation! Scarface!

5 star rating

DVD Collector, Film noir guru, admirer of great storytelling, Fan of Superb Productions, cult film connoisseur, movie connoisseur
Pros

    well-written, fast paced, Howard Hawks' direction, Pre-censorship code, Still brutal, & powerful

Cons
    None

APR
16
2008

Scarface (1932) — 

Scarface (1932)

An outstanding gangster movie from the original batch released in the early 1930's, Scarface was a thinly disguised essay on the career of Al Capone staring stage actor Paul Muni whose strange simian-like characterization of the gangster made for a compelling viewing experience. This is the film that was later remade as Scarface, starring Al Pacino.

Director Howard Hawks directed and Howard Hughes produced the definitive gangster movie. Along with Little Caesar and Public Enemy, Scarface took the genre a step further and paved the way for a slew of gangster movies from Warner Bros that helped to enrich their coffers in the lean years of the Depression.

As the film opens, a long tracking shot follows a janitor cleaning up after a wild party. After a long look at the janitor’s work, the camera swings over to the side where the last few revelers are discussing their plans for future crimes. The last guests leave, with only "Big Louie" Costillo, the crime boss, left.  Big Louie goes into a phone booth to make a call and shots ring out. This was the fictional version of the assassination of "Big Jim" Colossimo, the original godfather of Chicago. Johnny Torrio and Al Capone had allegedly killed him in similar fashion to that shown. What Torrio didn't know was his turn was next.

The next scene shows a newspaper office and the editor telling them to put "Gang War" in the next headline, very similar to the irresponsible press we all know and love.

 

In a typical police move they bring in all suspects including  Tony Camonte (Paul Muni) and his sidekick George Raft.  Camonte immediately begins to plot how to take over the Chicago underworld.

Camonte begins a war against all the other gangs, and soon knocks off all opposition shown in a variety of artful ways by cameraman Lee Garmes.  Now he is the boss of all Chicago.  But they didn’t tell him when you reach the top, the only way is down!

The video is very stylishly shot with stark black and white contrasts and innovative camera angles. Many of the gunplay scenes were shot with live ammunition on the empty stage then reshot with the actors and the takes superimposed to make an extremely realistic impression and a special effects tour de force. Gunfire and car wrecks that make your stomach churn are a characteristic of Scarface.

Howard Hawks deserves credit for making the hardest hitting, most stylish gangster movie of the era. With Paul Muni, a stage actor, his tendency was to overact with broad gestures suitable for live performances. In a lot of cases it looks like chewing the scenery, but here it is perfect for the character of the slow-witted Scarface.

The movie also has an incestuous subplot that kept it under wraps a year trying to pass the censors.  Finally, producer Howard Hughes released it unchanged without their approval. George Raft, as Guino Rinaldo, became typecast as the gangster who flipped a coin from playing this role.  

This is even better than the remake with Al Pacino.



I_thumb_up Scarface (1932) is recommended by GeorgeChabot

14
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about GeorgeChabot’s Review

 


GeorgeChabot wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18PM

In response to MikeMaroon's comment from Apr 18, 2008 at 7:30PM:

Hello to your little fren! ;> Thanks, Mike!

GeorgeChabot wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18PM

In response to MellaView's comment from Apr 18, 2008 at 3:30PM:

Hey, in very rare cases, the remake is better, but only once in a coon's age. The Maltese Falcon with Humphrey Bogart is one of the rare remakes that beats the original.

GeorgeChabot wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 9:17PM

In response to AmyA's comment from Apr 18, 2008 at 11:40AM:

Thank you, Baabsy! :>

GeorgeChabot wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 9:16PM

In response to LoveisJoy's comment from Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09PM:

They often held much more viewer attention when the filmmakers has to rely on their imagination rather than a computer. Far better movies, by and large.

MikeMaroon wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 7:30PM

Say hello to my little friend! Oh, sorry, wrong version...great review, though!

MellaView wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 3:30PM

I seriously had no clue there was a version before Al Pacinos. lol. Im excited to see this version now... the original is always the best... and I thought Pacino's was the best... ah nevermind. lol.

AmyA wrote on Apr 18, 2008 at 11:40AM

In response to LoveisJoy's comment from Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09PM:

I didn't know that either LoveisJoy....I learn so much on Viewpoints...great info George

LoveisJoy wrote on Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09PM

I didn't know that Pacino's version was a remake, either. I would love to see this version. It's funny how the "old" Hollywood movies are beginning to feel "new." :)

kevin wrote on Apr 17, 2008 at 9:29AM

And people wonder why Chicago (my fair city) is know for it's gangsters world wide. Sounds like the root of it is part truth and a lot due classics like this!

mrkstvns wrote on Apr 17, 2008 at 8:13AM

I loved Pacino's version so might have to take a look at the original to see for myself which one is best...

gitbean wrote on Apr 16, 2008 at 11:40PM

All hail the CLASSICS Gman....great review!

gitbean wrote on Apr 16, 2008 at 11:39PM

In response to kid-kansas's comment from Apr 16, 2008 at 11:17PM:

It's a classic!

kid-kansas wrote on Apr 16, 2008 at 11:17PM

I have seen the "Remake" but never this one, sounds like a real good one. ;)

PattyTherre wrote on Apr 16, 2008 at 10:35PM

I only ever saw the one with Al Pacino and never knew it was a remake. I should try to watch this one if it's even better!