Rolling Stone Magazine

Rolling Stone Magazine Reviews



Overall 3.5 star rating3.25 of 5 (by 4 users)



add to my favorites subscribe to feed
No one rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 5 stars
No one rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 5 stars%
0%
50% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 4 stars
50% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 4 stars%
50%
25% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 3 stars
25% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 3 stars%
25%
25% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 2 stars
25% of people rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 2 stars%
25%
No one rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 1 star
No one rated Rolling Stone Magazine as 1 star%
0%
100% Everyone recommends Rolling Stone Magazine Everyone recommends Rolling Stone Magazine 0%
 

Rolling Stone Magazine Comparison

4 star rating Most Helpful
Favorable Review
Rolling Stone Isn't As Bad As Many Say
SEP
28
2007

At its peak, Rolling Stone was a marvelous music and pop culture rag, while also dabbling in politics.  Over the years, the emphasis on music has lessened, the politics and pop culture has increased, and the quality of the magazine is not near where it was at it's peak in the early to mid 70s.  I don't...

 review »
magazine subscriber, seeking intelligent reads

MattA75
South Berwick, ME
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
2 star rating Most Helpful
Critical Review
Grain of salt
NOV
19
2007
Eh.  That is my reaction to this magazine.
I think that this magazine focuses too much on the crap pop that is 'popular' then really reviewing what is good and what is bad. 
They give bad reviews to underground hard working talented bands and good reviews to faces in the media because that is what... review »
reviewer
magazine subscriber

gothcatwoman33
Radford, VA
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 

Rolling Stone Magazine Ratings and Reviews

items/page: 15 | 30 | 50 displaying 1 to 2 of 4 sort by: most helpful | date | rating


D
Rolling Stone has good political coverage, too.
reading non-fiction, an avid reader

APR
30
2009

I got a free subscription to Rolling Stone last summer, as a result of buying some concert tickets online for my son; there was some sort of promotion going on that I wasn't aware of, and I was surprised to see it in my mailbox a few weeks later. But I was pleasantly surprised, not only because I hadn't really read it in many years, but because the national political campaign season was heating up, adn there was much to cover. RS' national affairs reporter, Matt Taibbi, provides scathing but trenchant observances of the national political scene, and, as RS is a journal of criticism, he presents...

 review »
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
write a comment
4 star rating
reviewer 2009 Reviewer
cilantrojane
Pittsburgh, PA



D
It used to really be relevant when I was a young, dumb liberal.
an avid reader, magazine subscriber, a fiction reader, reading non-fiction, into romance novels, a sci-fi buff, re-reading the classics

NOV
6
2009

Back in the day when I was an idealistic teen and 20-something, Rolling Stone was totally relevant to me. Now that I've grown up and grown brains, most of its politics offend me. I still subscribe, but now I read it to keep up with the music. There have actually been a few good exposes in the last few months, but the liberal leaning are a little much. Still, it's good to read what the "other side" is thinking!
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
write a comment
3 star rating
ClareBearNo1
Southern Pines, NC



Reviews of Rolling Stone Magazine


Start a New Discussion about Rolling Stone Magazine



view more in Magazines view more in Books & Magazines