Autos Baby Beauty Books Computers Education Electronics Health Home & Garden Local Places Movies Pets Travel Web Sites more…
LUSH Running To The Embassy Body Butter

LUSH Running To The Embassy Body Butter Review



Overall 2.00 of 5 (by 1 user)



Smells nice. That's about it.
2 star rating

a fan of home pedicures, a bath and body products lover, child-free, a LUSH addict
Pros

    vegan ingredients, fresh, handmade product, easy to use, pleasant scent

Cons
    doesn't exfoliate, doesn't moisturize, disappears quickly

JAN
17
2008

Running To The Embassy was the first LUSH body butter that I ever tried.  I wasn't impressed with it last February when I tried it, so I really have no idea why I picked up another one.  After using it again yesterday, my only consolation is that I picked it up for free during the LUSH Clean Slate promotion. 

This body butter is supposed to be an exfoliating, refreshing, and moisturizing product that was designed specifically for use on your feet.  The ingredients are simple: cocoa butter, pumice, shea butter, spearmint oil, peppermint oil, tagettes oil, chlorophyll, and perfume.  Running To The Embassy is sold in 3.3 ounce blocks for $10.95. 

The web site states that you can use this butter under water in the bath.  I would advise against that because it is thin and melts away very quickly.  The best way that I found to use it was to rub it onto dry feet, work the product into and across my feet, and then to rinse it all off. 

When all is said and done, Running To The Embassy is a disappointment.  There isn't enough pumice in it to truly exfoliate feet, nor is it thick or moisturizing enough to soften and soothe dry, cracked skin.  The spearmint fragrance is pleasant and different from most pedicure products, but it isn't enough to convince me to buy this body butter again.  Next time I will remember that I didn't like this stuff for a reason.

I_thumb_down LUSH Running To The Embassy Body Butter is not recommended by njchicaa


3
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
Review inappropriate? Copyright violation?




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about njchicaa’s Review



mrkstvns wrote on Jan 18, 2008 at 8:27AM


Now that *IS* a silly name for a product....