reviewer
margiemours
Mc Kees Rocks, PA

I thought Kodak had the market, was I wrong

1 star rating

a PC User
Pros

    Cost of Ink

Cons
    poor quality

MAY
10
2009

I recently bought this printer because my old one was completely out of ink.  Since Kodak advertises how cheap their ink is, I looked at the store to compare.  The price to replace my ink for the old printer was almost as much to buy a new Kodak printer.  It was $89.99.  Figuring cost savings in the future with ink, I purchased it.  It is the absolute worse printer I've ever owned.  It takes nearly a minute to print a simple page.  If you have anything that requires a lot of printing be prepared to sit there for a very long time waiting for it.  The qualiy of the ink isn't any better.  When you print a black document, it is so light it looks as if when your almost out of ink.  The color copies are not true colors, they are light also, and off a little.  I haven't used it any more than my old one and the ink levels are already at a half and a quarter used.  I just bought it two weeks ago.  The scanner also takes forever to scan.  I am just so disappointed because I really thought Kodak would be the way to go since they have been around forever.  It is such a bad purchase that I've decided to get the ink for my old printer, which is 5 years old and still works great, and plug it back in and put the Kodak ESP3 in the basement.



I_thumb_down Kodak ESP-3 is not recommended by margiemours

2
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about margiemours’s Review