Ford Ranger - 2003

Ford Ranger - 2003 Reviews



Overall 4.5 star rating4.25 of 5 (by 8 users)



50% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 5 stars
50% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 5 stars%
50%
25% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 4 stars
25% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 4 stars%
25%
25% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 3 stars
25% of people rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 3 stars%
25%
No one rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 2 stars
No one rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 2 stars%
0%
No one rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 1 star
No one rated Ford Ranger - 2003 as 1 star%
0%
83% 83% of people recommend Ford Ranger - 2003 17% of people don't recommend Ford Ranger - 2003 17%
 

Ford Ranger - 2003 Ratings and Reviews

items/page: 15 | 30 | 50 displaying 1 to 8 of 8 sort by: most helpful | date | rating


D
Dog Owner, a person who enjoys quality, an animal rescuer, a pet owner, Every day computer user, a cat owner, dog lover, cares for the environment

AUG
21
2007

My daughter and I were attending a lot of horse shows, and I needed something other than the little Cavalier that I had been driving. We went looking for a small truck. I had two types in mind. The Ford Ranger Edge Stepside was one of them. I tried one that was loaded with all the options, but decided I didn't like it. The following day I found, took home for the weekend, and then bought the few months old, red, extended cab, stepside model that I've been driving ever since!

This truck has been fantastic. The only real work it has needed was a brake cylinder and that was this year (2007). I've...

read full review »
5 star rating
mkf26
Elkview, WV



D
married, value conscious, daily driver, practical, not rich

FEB
23
2008
I bought my Ranger new and have been pleased with it. It only gets ~20 miles per gallon. OUCH! I live in the woods 15 miles from town. To get a gallon of milk, I have to drive 10 miles. At 54,000 miles two of the tires still have lots of tread. I had to replace two because one had a non repairable nail. $250.00 OUCH!
Had to replace the front pads at 45,000. All in all, a great truck. Just paid it off.
Headlights turn off before the battery dies.

5 star rating
reviewer
tombaxter
Tallahassee, FL



Reviews continue below ad
D

SEP
22
2009
w have had to put a new motor in 2003 ford. 1990 is still running on 1st engine and has has less than 2000$ of work done on it. 1990 ford is still running good andstill does not burn oil.
3 star rating
reviewer
cajunhillbilly
Yellville, AR



D

APR
18
2009
the best way to keep your automobile running and dependable is to have the automobile serviced regularly
5 star rating
reviewer
ronjay73
Grover, NC



D

FEB
4
2009
I have a lift kit and no steps so I have a hard time getting into it, otherwise I love it!
3 star rating
reviewer
oldaccountant
Barstow, CA



D

Rated on September 1, 2009

4 star rating
reviewer
williadean
kermit, TX



D

Rated on December 14, 2008

4 star rating
reviewer
bowhunterstahl
Trumann, AR



D
daily driver, cost-conscious, not rich, practical, fuel-conscious, Safety conscious, a busy person, married

DEC
9
2008

Our 2003 Ford Ranger Edge was purchased new from a local dealer. My husband is the main driver, and we both love this truck for it's practicality and reasonable cost.  We started by visiting all the local dealerships  to narrow down his choices, and he preferred the Ranger Edge because of the compact size and ease of use as well as basic no-frills cost.  After listing his wants and needs for features, I started shopping both online and off, checking the various reviews and and price guides.  It took a couple of months of negotiation, but we got the vehicle he wanted at the price we could...

read full review »
5 star rating
2008 Contributor
dionaea
Cookeville, TN



Reviews of Ford Ranger - 2003


Start a New Discussion about Ford Ranger - 2003