reviewer
Lipsink
Danville, KY

SAVE YOUR $$$$ FOR CHOCOLATE!!!

1 star rating

looking for convenience, neat freak, a homeowner, practical, a green thumb, Cost conscious
Pros

    extra-long power cord, Bagless

Cons
    heavy, not handy at cleaning stairs, NOISY, expensive, Attachments can be tricky, Be wary on delicate rugs, The extension arm can be difficult

MAR
23
2008

Dyson - Animal DC07 - Upright Bagless Cyclonic Vacuum — 

  I clean houses for a living and I always use my clients vacuum.  I think this gives me alot of expertise in judging the quality and ease of use of different vacuum cleaners.  I can state with absolute conviction that Dyson is the most poorly engineered vacuum on the market.  It is a nightmare to use, picks up dirt poorly and tends to chew-up and spew out at high velocity whatever it fails to pick-up.

  When you use a Dyson you must have your cleaning plan of attack  prepared in advance, otherwise plan to spend most of your time assembling and disassembling the extension arm from the hose.  I hate that when using the Dyson I cannot easily convert from vacuuming the floor to adding an attachment.  With almost any other vacuum I can go around a room and clean the floor, dust drapes, clean baseboard etc. easily converting from floor cleaning to above floor cleaning---not  so with the Dyson.

  The Dyson has a bit  of difficulty adjusting to varying carpet heights and is a heavy awkward misery to use on stairs.  On the positive side it empties its baggless canister easily (just make sure you have it down deep inside of your chosen receptacle or the dust will fly) and it rarely succeeds in swallowing scatter rugs.  The Dyson works best on wall-to-wall carpet; most poorly on hardwood, vinyl and tile. My final advice, buy a different vacuum and SAVE YOUR $$$ FOR CHOCOLATE!!!



I_thumb_down Dyson - Animal DC07 - Upright Bagless Cyclonic Vacuum is not recommended by Lipsink

1
helpful
vote
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about Lipsink’s Review

 


Lipsink wrote on Aug 9, 2009 at 8:33AM

In response to Lylaloverose's comment from Aug 8, 2009 at 11:19PM:

I have used as my personal vacuum and highly recommend the Kenmore ( made by Panasonic) canister vacuum. I've had 2 in the past 20 years and am considering purchasing my third. They have the canister available in several price ranges and bizzare colors, I've purchased mine in the $280.00 dollar range (usually less on sale!) and have been most pleased with it's performance over the years. This vacuum works great on carpet with a height-adjustable lighted power nozzel attachment. You can easily switch to clean hardwood tile etc. with a floor brush attachment. The vacuum also had a self retractable cord, I think they are approx. 17' in length but I'm not sure. Newer models have an adjustable extension wand which you can adjust to make the wand height comfortable to your own height or to reach way up there for cobwebs etc. The only down side is that the bags are somewhat expensive for the Kenmore around $15.00 for 10 bags if I recall correctly. However, the bags last well over a month, and I vacuum my house almost daily as I have a hairy dog. The vacuum has a neat feature for stairs, where it will sit without rolling atop a step so you never have to lug it halfway up and balance the canister while cleaning. It has self-storing, attachments inside a lidded compartment so that nothing gets bumped off or lost while cleaning. I think most come with a mini-powered attachment for upholstery or whatever. The other thing I find most important while vacuuming is being able to go undermeath furniture. The Kenmore is by far the most nimble. With the power nozzle you can go at least 4 inches under a couch, with the floor bush attachment you can go all the way under. This vacuum cleans very well. My final thought is that generally upright vacuums have better suction, however if you vaccum frequently (which all carpet manufacturers recommend!) a canister vaccum does a comperable job. Hope this was helpful!

Lylaloverose wrote on Aug 8, 2009 at 11:19PM

If you ever look at this again, can you recommend any others?