Dr. Benjamin Fiss - Chicago, IL

Dr. Benjamin Fiss - Chicago, IL Review


pin

919 N Michigan Ave • Chicago, IL 60611
312-951-5230 • www.drfiss.com



Overall 3.29 of 5 view all 7 reviews
 




reviewer
punkinhead
Chicago, IL

He dismissed my complaints of pain and a bad tooth - twice

1 star rating

Pros

    Beautiful Office, Friendly guy

Cons
    He's in another world sometimes.

MAR
23
2009

I told Dr. Fiss that I was having pain in one of my teeth and could he take a look at it. He looked in my mouth and said, no, nothing wrong there. I thought, that's great. But I had an unsettling feeling as I left because although he promised me there was no problem, he hadn't taken an x-ray. Shouldn't he have done that, I wondered. So a month goes by and the tooth hurts even more. I didn't know what to do. Dr. Fiss said there was no problem. But it's a problem for me. So I call Dr. Fiss again and he tells his receptionist to tell me to see another dentist - a specialist I guess.

So I went to this other dentist and she takes an x-ray and said, you have a root canal in that tooth already so I can't help you. I guess she was just a root canal doctor. She said, go to this other dentist, and maybe he can save your tooth. So I go to another dentist and he looks at an x-ray and said, your tooth has got to go. And he removed it.

I wondered later, if Dr. Fiss had just taken an x-ray like these two doctors, couldn't we have taken care of this sooner? But I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he was rushed the day I came in with my bad tooth. I thought, I'll ask him if I should've asked him to take an x-ray originally.

So a couple months go by and what do you know, I've got another painful tooth. So I go to see Dr. Fiss. Before he takes a look at it, I ask him, should I have insisted you take an x-ray when I came to see you before? Because I ended up with pain for a month that evidently was unnecessary and the tooth had to be removed. And he said something that didn't make sense so I asked him again, should I have asked you to x-ray that tooth the first time I came? And he said, well, I knew Dr. So and So (that he referred me to a month later) would take an x-ray and I didn't want to expose you to unnecessary radiation. And I said, but you didn't tell me to go see her when I came to see you. You just said that there was nothing wrong with my tooth. You didn't know that a month hence I would be calling you back and you would then recommend me to see her.

Okay so I just let it go because I figure it's obvious he did the wrong thing and won't admit it.

But then - and this is unbelievable - I said, could you take a look at this tooth in the back here, it's sore. He took a look at it and said, nothing wrong with that. It's probably just food that gets wedged in there. Pul-eeese! I know the difference between teeth that need flossing and a tooth that is in trouble. I've had an absessed tooth once. I know how it begins.

And then - unbelievable - he doesn't take an x-ray.

Now I can't go back to him. If I can't count on my dentist to take an x-ray when I say I'm in pain, than I can't count on him to protect the health of my teeth.

I just don't get it. It would have been more fees for him to x-ray me - which could possibly have resulted in him giving me a crown and thus more money. I don't get it. Go figure.

He was a nice guy though.  

 

 

Last edited on Mar 24, 2009



1
helpful
vote
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about punkinhead’s Review

 


drfiss wrote on Mar 26, 2009 at 11:19AM

FACT OR FICTION? Legally speaking, writing a poor review on an internet site might qualify as libel when the facts that are written are incorrect. Libel is, by classic legal definition, a publication of false facts, without privilege or lawful excuse which injures the reputation of another by exposing him to hatred, contempt, or ridicule. So how do I defend myself as well as the reputation of my practice that I have worked so hard to achieve? All I can do is state the facts as I know them to be true. In 30 years that I have practiced, I have always taken films on patients who are having any pain or discomfort, unless there are current films that are readily available or the patient chooses not to have them taken. Many times disease is in its early stages and is not radiographically evident. Radiographic progression of disease may take 3-6 months to appear on a film.
If in fact this patient had another tooth that was bothering them, and they had brought up the fact that I did not take an x-ray the first time, it would not make any sense for me to "disregard" their concerns, when the last time they complained of pain they ended up loosing a tooth.