|
|
27% |
|
|
45% |
|
|
10% |
|
|
9% |
|
|
9% |
Most Helpful
Most HelpfulDinner Impossible could be a fun show if it weren't for its star chef Robert Irvine. The premise of the show is to give Irvine incredibly hard cooking challenges and short time limits and see if he can complete his goal in time. Some challenges have been things like replicating an authentic colonial...
review »
I've watched several episodes of Dinner Impossible on Food-Network and I must agree with the general consensus. The show has a great pretense, but, the host is just too much. I, too, expected a little something different when I first saw the show. Yes, some of the challenges are interesting and the idea of the show is a winner. Chef Irvine takes all the fun out of it with his overbearing, self centered antics and the abuse of his "volunteer" staff. Besides, how "impossible" can it be with food, pans, money and staff available to help you? He is what makes "dinner" impossible.
Ask...
review »I think Dinner Impossible is a good type of reality show. It was fun to watch and see what he could come up with in a short amount of time. I am not sure that he was the best man for the job, but he put a lot of hard work into the challenge.
I guess we are getting a new host for the show and I have not seen that one yet. I like the idea, more than the person, so it will be fun to watch future episodes. I think it will also give me ideas for doing potlucks or dinners at the last minute as well!