Thanks for the nice words. It's so liberating to go from positions where you know your condition will cause discrimination to a world where you say, "This is what I have, and I aim to help shout out things from the rooftops"
And isn't the gestational study interesting? I'm not sure how well the group was adjusted for lifestyle, genetics and other variables beforehand. What I do know is that 3% of women in the group (and it was a big sample) developed Type 2 vs. 19% who developed Type 2 after having gestational diabetes. The good news, of course, is that the 19% still means that 81% didn't, but I dislike that 1 in 5 number. It gets awfully close to the 1 in 3 number the ADA is using as a projection for children born in the year 2000 or later.