300

300 Review



Overall 4.46 of 5 view all 151 reviews
 




reviewer
bdlong161
Princeton, NJ
300 is the worst movie I've ever seen!
1 star rating

into Independent Films, a movie buff, character-lover, comedy fan, married, a fan of clever plots, into action flicks, a movie lover
show all »
Cons
    Not a historical movie, not historically accurate, Soulless, not for children, Full of American Freedom cliches, Not for everyone, Too many scantily clad men, Terrible acting, No characterization, totally predictable, It has a Narrator!!, Historically Inaccurate, 2 hours of blood and gore, Fights just repeat over and over again

APR
30
2008

300  — 

So here is the basic scoop on "300" (in other words, this is why I hated it):
1) No Characterization at all - I won't really call it bad acting because since the actors didn't have squat to work with (this is most important to me because I am first and foremost, when it comes to film and theater, an actor).
2) Narrator - I don't need my intellegence insulted by some dude explaining to me what I am watching
3) American Freedom cliches - enough said
4) I suppose that the cinematography was alright - the fighting got old after about 10 minutes, though - spartan flips persian (or various kinds) over his shield in slow-mo, stabs him in slow-mo, and then blood sprays everywhere in slow-mo - After a while I thought the fighting was just being looped
5) Totally predictable - enough said



I_thumb_down 300 is not recommended by bdlong161

2
helpful
votes
Did you find this review helpful?
 
 
 




I_comment_shdw24 Comments about bdlong161’s Review